Shitsburg at Champs 8/10

[gp956]

Fair enough. But it was either Nolan or clearly someone who knew who Nolan was. I cannot imagine a newbie coming here, being accused of being someone from another board, and letting it slide. My Perry Mason skills are clearly waning, though.

I agree most people would deny it. But it's just a piece of evidence from which I would not base a conclusion.

 

[gp956]

... even though he didnt deserve it. We gave him a conditional pass on staying and contributing...and he still couldnt conduct himself accordingly. smh

Ready the ban hammer!

Exactly.

Here's what that sociopath (in my non-professional opinion) deserves:

 

[filosofy29]

I agree most people would deny it. But it's just a piece of evidence from which I would not base a conclusion.

I agree, I would never base a conclusion that he IS NolanNonsense based on just glossing over the situation (or at least not denying it). That said, it's odd behavior when a person is met with the same accusations over and over again and then being purposely aloof about the scenario at hand.

Bottom line as far as I'm concerned, he is one of the two:
1.) NolanNonsense himself

or

2.) Someone who knows him that is imitating his behavior to piss off the board.

IF he does come back from his 24 hour (at least I think that's what it is) banning. He has ONE post exactly to explain himself, otherwise, I will ban his IP address for good.

 

[calsnowskier]

A shame about Bonds and I was the last guy to figure it out. I was overseas without much news, loving all those homers and was blissfully unaware of steroids until much later.

FYI...

THIS was the post that proved it to me...

 

[nateistheshi]

I agree, I would never base a conclusion that he IS NolanNonsense based on just glossing over the situation (or at least not denying it). That said, it's odd behavior when a person is met with the same accusations over and over again and then being purposely aloof about the scenario at hand.

Bottom line as far as I'm concerned, he is one of the two:
1.) NolanNonsense himself

or

2.) Someone who knows him that is imitating his behavior to piss off the board.

IF he does come back from his 24 hour (at least I think that's what it is) banning. He has ONE post exactly to explain himself, otherwise, I will ban his IP address for good.

Here, here. That being said, your avatar makes me cry Filo

 

[gp956]

I agree, I would never base a conclusion that he IS NolanNonsense based on just glossing over the situation (or at least not denying it). That said, it's odd behavior when a person is met with the same accusations over and over again and then being purposely aloof about the scenario at hand.

Bottom line as far as I'm concerned, he is one of the two:
1.) NolanNonsense himself

or

2.) Someone who knows him that is imitating his behavior to piss off the board.

IF he does come back from his 24 hour (at least I think that's what it is) banning. He has ONE post exactly to explain himself, otherwise, I will ban his IP address for good.

It is odd, I agree. And yes, your alternatives are the most likely. Though either one is good enough for banning, IMO. I think the infraction ban is four days, if I read Ghost's post correctly.

 

[gp956]

FYI...

THIS was the post that proved it to me...

Here's what convinced me:

Dang Torres. Too many .200 hitters in this lineup.

The use of "Dang". Dead giveaway.

 

[filosofy29]

It is odd, I agree. And yes, your alternatives are the most likely. Though either one is good enough for banning, IMO. I think the infraction ban is four days, if I read Ghost's post correctly.

You're probably right gp. My 24 hour guess was just that.....a blind stab.

If you remember reading something Ghost wrote, I'd trust your judgement over mine.

 

[gp956]

You're probably right gp. My 24 hour guess was just that.....a blind stab.

If you remember reading something Ghost wrote, I'd trust your judgement over mine.

Looks like it's 5 days:

Also... If three "trusted members" give someone an infraction within a certain amount of time, that person is banned for 5 days.

This works very well. One becomes a trusted member automatically by an algorithm.

Infraction button is the little yellow and red arrow button.

 

[msgkings322]

Quote:
Originally Posted by msgkings322 View Post
Also, it has the Dbacks winning, so that can't be right.

Don't be so sure. This appears to be a team on the come and one who just won a game that seemed like a lost cause. We'll see if the Giants wake up and start hitting. Last night, following Stewart's homerun, was the first time I've seen that dugout looking loose in a long time. Mota's reaction made me smile.



I knew it from his screen name alone, but this post above sealed it. As Heathbar pointed out, his SN wasn't even trying to hide. That was actually a little clever.

 

[Stokes1931]

Well, we have five days of no new poster, whatever his real identity is.

So we can post about baseball, or just give one another a hard time, or tell drinking stories. Sort of like ice fishing without the kid who has to go pee every five minutes. The poster's presence is a distraction, and we gladly jumped at the chance. Once he appeared, the number of actual baseball related posts were almost zero. THAT'S why the moron ought to be banned. We also need to be better at ignoring said behavior, IMHO. Carry on.

 

[calsnowskier]

Well, we have five days of no new poster, whatever his real identity is.

So we can post about baseball, or just give one another a hard time, or tell drinking stories. Sort of like ice fishing without the kid who has to go pee every five minutes. The poster's presence is a distraction, and we gladly jumped at the chance. Once he appeared, the number of actual baseball related posts were almost zero. THAT'S why the moron ought to be banned. We also need to be better at ignoring said behavior, IMHO. Carry on.

Would rep if I could...

Yes, NN is a doosh, but if we did not obsess about him, he would starve and die. We keep him well fed.

 

[Stokes1931]

Would rep if I could...

Yes, NN is a doosh, but if we did not obsess about him, he would starve and die. We keep him well fed.

Guilty as charged, Your Honor. Representing me will be the honorable TZill. :p

 

[msgkings322]

Well, we have five days of no new poster, whatever his real identity is.

So we can post about baseball, or just give one another a hard time, or tell drinking stories. Sort of like ice fishing without the kid who has to go pee every five minutes. The poster's presence is a distraction, and we gladly jumped at the chance. Once he appeared, the number of actual baseball related posts were almost zero. THAT'S why the moron ought to be banned. We also need to be better at ignoring said behavior, IMHO. Carry on.

True enough. But it was also nice to vent on a lousy game day. If we were winning 8-0 I bet we'd have let his act slide at least for a while.

 

[msgkings322]

Would rep if I could...

Yes, NN is a doosh, but if we did not obsess about him, he would starve and die. We keep him well fed.

I thought we were doing our part not obsessing over him/feeding him by posting here and not on ESPN. When he showed up here, I was livid. I'd/we'd already conceded that place to him, but this place is OURS.

 

[calsnowskier]

I thought we were doing our part not obsessing over him/feeding him by posting here and not on ESPN. When he showed up here, I was livid. I'd/we'd already conceded that place to him, but this place is OURS.

Fair enough, however, there was rarely a day that passed on this board that did not have a healthy dose of "The Daily NN Watch".

 

[gp956]

Fair enough, however, there was rarely a day that passed on this board that did not have a healthy dose of "The Daily NN Watch".

Let's discuss your observations some more.....

 

[tzill]

I agree, I would never base a conclusion that he IS NolanNonsense based on just glossing over the situation (or at least not denying it). That said, it's odd behavior when a person is met with the same accusations over and over again and then being purposely aloof about the scenario at hand.

Bottom line as far as I'm concerned, he is one of the two:
1.) NolanNonsense himself

or

2.) Someone who knows him that is imitating his behavior to piss off the board.

IF he does come back from his 24 hour (at least I think that's what it is) banning. He has ONE post exactly to explain himself, otherwise, I will ban his IP address for good.

Dudes!!!

He ADMITTED he made the Zito prediction...that was Nolan. He tacitly admitted to his felonious douchebaggery.

As the board's virtual attorney, our case is proven. Judgement and sentence have been rendered. If he comes back under another name, he'll reveal himself and be banned again.

 

[tzill]

Guilty as charged, Your Honor. Representing me will be the honorable TZill. :p

We plead innocence by way of duress.

Your invoice is in the mail.

 

[Mozart'sGhost]

Not looking good for the boys right now.