• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Sharks vs Hawks

sTyLnK

Member
975
0
16
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Location
Canada
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Problem with the Sharks is that they play well in the beginning of the game, but as the game wears on they just stay at that level. Chicago though always seems to amp up their play as the game goes on. Seems to be the difference. At least IMO.

Not taking anything away from the Sharks. They're busting there tails off. Chicago is just the better team.
 

Destroydacre

Throws stuff out windows
8,551
1,451
173
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Location
Spokane, WA
Hoopla Cash
$ 90.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Problem with the Sharks is that they play well in the beginning of the game, but as the game wears on they just stay at that level. Chicago though always seems to amp up their play as the game goes on. Seems to be the difference. At least IMO.

Not taking anything away from the Sharks. They're busting there tails off. Chicago is just the better team.

The problem is they put pucks in their own net...
 

GagneFire12

Miley Cyrus, say what?
3,942
1
0
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Location
In a flat with tinted sunlight and creaky floorboa
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The sad thing is, as good as the Blackhawks have been, it's hard to give them the clear advantage in terms of play. Now, they have been FAR more opportunistic than San Jose, and sometimes that makes all the difference (as we are seeing right now).
 

Destroydacre

Throws stuff out windows
8,551
1,451
173
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Location
Spokane, WA
Hoopla Cash
$ 90.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The sad thing is, as good as the Blackhawks have been, it's hard to give them the clear advantage in terms of play. Now, they have been FAR more opportunistic than San Jose, and sometimes that makes all the difference (as we are seeing right now).

That and Niemi has been better than Nabokov too.
 
Top