F1 is not attempting to make a play on the ball. That's why the called it yesterday. I'd say grabbing a guys arm to prevent him from having a break away qualifies
They ruled that Villanova never had possession.
F1 is not attempting to make a play on the ball. That's why the called it yesterday. I'd say grabbing a guys arm to prevent him from having a break away qualifies
1st half was in Nova's favor. I thought the second was in Wisky's favor. But when was the last time fans bitched about 1st half calls?I actually thought the officiating was going slightly against Wisky TBH. A couple of those foul calls against Happ were questionable...
I got them beating Louisville, but falling to Oregon in the Sweet 16 match-up.I don't give a fuck anymore. I hope Michigan busts everyone's bracket tomorrow.
Oregon has a key injury which is why I didn't pick them going far.I got them beating Louisville, but falling to Oregon in the Sweet 16 match-up.
NW looks like ass.
That 3rd on Happ was crap...1st half was in Nova's favor. I thought the second was in Wisky's favor. But when was the last time fans bitched about 1st half calls?
Clear path you have to have possession. I don't think he would have been able to keep it in bounds, much less take possession himself.I don't think so but this is why the call yesterday was so bad. Pretty much every foul late in a game is a foul without making a play on the ball do when you call it once it's going to start a stream of calls that demand the same. If you don't do so then it's going to cause bugs questions. Ultimately a guy got prevented from a layup because he got grabbed. That's intentional or flagrant by the very definition. Do I want it called that way? No. But you can't pick and choose
That 3rd on Happ was crap...