fightinredantz
Well-Known Member
You say that but Wade will have that D playing out of their minds .. You never know .
The D is has not been the problem for the Rams. Lack of offense has been. We will see if the Offense gets moving in 2017.
You say that but Wade will have that D playing out of their minds .. You never know .
Funny. Is that your personal opinion or did that come from inside sources. Tell you what Cd why don't show everyone on this board " serious posts " not a obvious smartass post " since middle of last season where I've said Trevor is the answer or that Lynch cannot be the guy or future for Denver. I've steadfastly defended Trevor regarding your criticism of his play because it was unfair due to the terrible O line play that greatly influenced the pass and run game. I thought and still think your criticisms and " expert " evaluations are flawed. I've also been very disagreeable and quite baffled by your position and comments regarding Lynch and your " sources " that he's STILL Elways guy and despite what all I'm seeing and hearing out of Denver camp/players and via all the NFL shows I watch everyday reiterate over and over that Denver and JE are very confident in Trevor, they were very proud of how he performed considering the lack of support he dealt with. Everything I've heard on Lynch and a lot lately is " project " and " not ready for 2017 season. That Denver and JE would not consider trading Trevor regardless if they signed Romo because..Recent quote " That Lynch from what I understand talking to Bronco sources , still has a ways to go and is considered at this point, a project that still needs more time ". So pal, everything myself and others said since prob week 6 ( basically when Denver started losing and looking bad on offense and you started bad mouthing Trevor and Rbs and sticking up for the trash o line ) has so far has held much more perception and conjecture than yours. Go for it
All class.Honestly Randymon I just need to apologize. I shouldn't have called you out like I did. It was childish of me and not why I come on these boards to talk football. So again sorry for that. I think this argument about the QB's has played out at this point. I hope you understand that I really do like Siemian. If he is our starting QB I will be one of his biggest fans every Sunday hoping for him to do well. Heck if he moves on to another team depending which one I'll probably cheer for him there too. He is a likable guy that his teammates highly respect for his toughness and hard work that he puts in every day. So I do wish him success whether here or elsewhere (other than Chiefs, Patriots, Raiders, Chargers). I also wish Lynch success whether that be here or elsewhere. I do know both are working their tail off this offseason to be the starter for the Broncos this upcoming season. That is all I can ask from any Bronco player.
Smokescreen?
League rules AND it's probably a smokescreen. Does anyone believe that the Broncos haven't had one meeting to discuss whether or not they should try to get Romo to Denver?
They honestly can't talk about Romo at all or admit that they are talking about him. There rules are tricky with all of that and honestly I wonder which media guy asked them about Romo because either they planted the question to make it look like they have no interest or the media guy just asked a very stupid question that could have gotten the Broncos in trouble if they had answered it differently.
Sorry if this didn't come across well. Teams cannot openly say they are going after players or talking about players under contract. Of course they are talking about players under contract. I mean they call to ask about tradesTeams are talking about players under contract all the time. You can't tell me that when we play a team that the organization doesn't know who is going to be a free agent the next off season, or a possible cap causality. I am sure they have discussions about guys that will be free agents in the next year or two a head of time. They would not be doing their due diligence if they didn't take the time they have to truly study players before they are free agents.
Both teams definitely have a lot to offer. Both have top-5 defenses in the league.
Both have weapons on offense that can score at any time.
I would say while I do think Houston has the better OL I wouldn't say it is a great OL either though. So both have some questions on the OL.
Money wise my guess is both would come in with similar deals.
Franchise wise obviously Broncos have had the most success and especially recent success to show this is a winning culture.
A couple of questions I do have about Houston...Bill O'Brien has not gotten along with any QB he has had other than Brady. How does Tony Romo then fit into that picture? Along that same lines is Romo designed the offense that the Cowboys have run with him over the years. Does O'Brien make him play his system or can he actually give up some of that control to a player? Romo has said he doesn't want to learn a new offense. WE know McCoy has no problem giving up that control or changing things as they go.
Then yes the other big plus for the Broncos is Elway. Romo from what I understand wants to take a similar path to what Elway has done post playing career. Elway has had no problem allowing other guys into meetings to see how things are run. Look at Lynch with the 49ers. He talked a lot about how Elway really let him in on the entire process of a season and helped train him up even though he didn't actually work for the organization.
I have no clue which team he will pick. I can understand either of them being the choice. I just hope he realizes that location really shouldn't be a major concern. Flying from Denver or flying from Houston is not going to be a huge difference and I'm not sure how often he is going to be able to do it during the season anyway. Plus would it really be that hard to find a place in Denver that his family could come and visit at times? I mean we are looking at a 1-2 year rental here so not like he has to give up his place in Texas.