- Thread starter
- #801
We will show the bench as well but we should be using starters to determine winners and losers
Just realized you are giving people the option to opt out of picking after they feel they got their best 22 players so some peoples bench might be smaller then others.
If we are gonna list bench we should finish all 22 rounds. Can you text Milk please.
Why not finish all rounds and have each team throw out a unit for each personel grouping instead of picking one? Base, nickel and dime on defense and on offense 11 personnel (3 WR, 1 RB, 1 TE), 12 perosnnel (2 WR, 2 TE, 1 RB) and 21 personnel (2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE)
I say just list the starters. Don't think you should be punished for having a player on your bench that doesn't fit your scheme because you drafted them before having a partner or going with a different plan/scheme. Of course I am fine with what ever the majority says.
No NFL team ever just stays in one personnel package the whole game, well except the giants on offense this year lol. This would be more like a real NFL draft than ever before.
We will show the bench as well but we should be using starters to determine winners and losers
Yes but they also know going into the draft what scheme they will be running.
But we did agree we were doing 22 so just starters should be posted BUT thats where what I was talking about before comes into play, some teams might play a FB some might go 3 wide, so its kinda not fair to our defenses not to be able to sub for both those scenarios.
Exactly. I'm gonna use Strahan in a 4 man front in our sub packageNo NFL team ever just stays in one personnel package the whole game, well except the giants on offense this year lol. This would be more like a real NFL draft than ever before.