- Thread starter
- #21
Somebody was Dungee, Harrison or Chris Sims on the Sunday night or Monday game.
Cmon now...let’s bet!!!!Me too on the +10 cover. @Sportster 72
Ready to go head to head in predictive awesomeness again this week? Hee!
Something we haven’t addressed much (as fans) in terms of the points scored against us yesterday imo.Defense giving up big plays also takes us out of games
You want me to take the under. I think it will be over but I'll take it.Cmon now...let’s bet!!!!i like my chances for a comeback!
I get confused on the terminology sometimes. What I’m trying to say is that I’ll take the Skins +10 this week against the Rams.You want me to take the under. I think it will be over but I'll take it.
I agree. Today’s game and franchises are looking for the next ‘generational’ QB. If a team has just a ‘guy’ who may become better than average...they cut bait and continue the search too soon. JMHO.QBs and short strings. With the growth of the media and so many people giving their opinions on TV, the radio and in print and the growth of the draft. The "Bust" became an in vogue word. Contracts for 1st year QBs went way you so if you weren't worth all the money you were getting paid then you were a bust and possibly a guy without a job. That is what happened to QBs learning on the job. How many Aaron Rodgers are around now and thank god for him that he was drafted later in the 1st round. It isn't fair but it is today's game.
Great point about JDR and RRs Health. I’ve wondered that myself. Glad that I’m not the only one who was a bit disappointed.Cali, I was thinking about the D today. I was really excited about JDR as the DC. Still am. But a bit disappointed. Anyhow, after hearing RR's presser today and RR saying how much he appreciates JDR helping him and stepping in when needed. I wondered to myself if that is hurting him coaching the D a little. Just a thought.
The under is giving the points. +9 or better. You have the over +10 and everything after that.I get confused on the terminology sometimes. What I’m trying to say is that I’ll take the Skins +10 this week against the Rams.
It is what money did to the game. There won't be anymore Monte Coleman's or guys like him. You are trying to get better while you have guys on their first contracts. That is why five year plans do not really work. All these good players the Skins have Scary Terry, the DLine, possibly Haskins are all going to want to get paid. It is why you have to be careful with FA because if you spend too much on them you can't pay the guys you should. It also shortens guys careers. Who wants to pay a lot of money for a mediocre player.I agree. Today’s game and franchises are looking for the next ‘generational’ QB. If a team has just a ‘guy’ who may become better than average...they cut bait and continue the search too soon. JMHO.
To be fair, there are a lot of ‘bridge just a guy’ QBs some years that can provide better immediate play than the young ins. I’ll leave it to those experts that understand today’s game way better than I about which strategy is sounder.
I tend to fall in the middle. Teams really don’t have the luxury of coddling a new QB for years, due to dollars, time, fan expectations etc. I mean what fan base is interested in tanking a FULL tear for R&D with no emphasis on winning. Why is winning and growth being trotted out as mutually exclusive? To me, a culture change includes a winning mentality followed up by the small things and actions on the field. So I dunno...