Flyingiguana
New Member
goodwin?
Of every safety who has played 50% of his team's defensive snaps, he has the worst tackle against the run efficiency rating in the NFL. He's 5th worst in the same tackling category against the pass. If you combine those two numbers, he's the worst.
He's in the upper half of the league for most targeted, upper half (worst) for most attempts against as the primary man in coverage, upper half (worst) for most successful attempts against as the primary man in coverage, and upper half (worst) for most receptions primarily responsible for while in coverage.
Common fan numbers your thing? As far as JUST safeties go. He's not in the top 40 for tackles, he's tied for 3rd worst for missed tackles, is only 25th in the entire NFL for stopping a player when he has reasonable opportunity to do so (including sack plays), isn't in the top 60 in catch percentage, isn't in the top 60 in yards into his coverage area allowed (51 yards more to qualifying for 60th), is outside the top 10 in INTs, and is tied for 62nd in passes defensed.
I don't get it, but that's just me.
...Including 5 defensive starters! I bet the Seahawks cracked up when they saw that.
He led fan voting.
...Including 5 defensive starters! I bet the Seahawks cracked up when they saw that.
And they would look fairly foolish for doing so like many players do when they advocate for one of "their boys" to be on the team. The only questionable defensive starter you could make a case against starting or even being named to the team is Donte Whitner.