Across The Field
Oaky Afterbirth
So just so we're clear, we agree it's literally only his athleticism that's better than Haskins, which is apparently what you value most then. Fair enough.Not really.
So just so we're clear, we agree it's literally only his athleticism that's better than Haskins, which is apparently what you value most then. Fair enough.Not really.
I think Haskins has a good shot at being the best but he certainly isnt the most complete package. He isn't mobile, his spiral kinda stinks, and he can't throw off platform.QB: Haskins
RB: Montgomery
WR: Harry
TE: Hock
In a weak draft class, Haskins is imo the most complete package out of the group.
So just so we're clear, we agree it's literally only his athleticism that's better than Haskins, which is apparently what you value most then. Fair enough.
Well you don't value arm talent or intelligence more, since Haskins has it on Jones there, too. All you basically mentioned was Jones' athletic ability/mobility.It's not what I value most. If it was, Murray would be my best QB prospect.
Well you don't value arm talent or intelligence more, since Haskins has it on Jones there, too. All you basically mentioned was Jones' athletic ability/mobility.
![]()
Yeah, I read that pre-snap thing too. I'm guessing you saw the same article I did. I'm guessing you can explain that about as well as I can.Jones is really good pre snap. And I did mention he had an awful supporting cast around him. Not only offensive line play, but Jones' receivers were 2nd in fbs in dropped passes.
Yeah, I read that pre-snap thing too. I'm guessing you saw the same article I did. I'm guessing you can explain that about as well as I can.
Certainly didn't hurt him that he played in an excessively weak division, either.
Depends on which website you use. What I can tell you, however, is that Haskins performed exceptionally better last year.I'm sure Haskins is good presnap too. Both can be equally good at the intelligence factor.
And I'm not sure bringing up schedule strength is the best argument either. Duke played an overall tougher schedule than OSU did last year, at least during the regular season.
Josh Allen was an extremely overrated QB. Sucked against bad competition. Sucked even worse against decent competition.Josh Allen was a much better prospect imo than Haskins and Murray are. So, yeah I would. All these qb's are worse prospects than the top 4 last year.
Depends on which website you use. What I can tell you, however, is that Haskins performed exceptionally better last year.
If Daniel Jones was 6'2", do you honestly think he'd be considered a first round possibility?
If you feel that way about Jones, you must think Haskins, Murray, and Lock are destined to be busts.Yeah he played better last year, that's why he was in NYC.
And idk.
Josh Allen was an extremely overrated QB. Sucked against bad competition. Sucked even worse against decent competition.
If you feel that way about Jones, you must think Haskins, Murray, and Lock are destined to be busts.
Montgomery has quickness and elusiveness which is more important than straight line speed in a RB. Plus the dude breaks tackles like it's no one's business . Fant gets a bad rso on blocking . He's not as good a blocker as Hockenson but he's still an anove average blocker .Murray - too small
Montgomery - too slow
Butler - bad hands
Fant - can't block
Jones has been coached the best of the top prospects.Yeah, I read that pre-snap thing too. I'm guessing you saw the same article I did. I'm guessing you can explain that about as well as I can.
Certainly didn't hurt him that he played in an excessively weak division, either.
Jones has been coached the best of the top prospects.