- Thread starter
- #1
countryroads316
Well-Known Member
I don't wish injury on players but I believe Will Compton is an upgrade over him
Just curious.....How will Compton be an up-grade over Riley in your opinion(s)?
Perry Riley's 40 speed is 4.69 seconds........Will Compton's 40 speed is 4.83
um you may wanna check that again Comptons 40 is 4.54
shark these posters are like the weather. I say what I feel I don't care what anyone thinks of me. The team comes first.
socal I am not better than anyone here. You talk out of both sides of you mouth. As a Redskins fan, you weren't pissed off after the non holding call against rak?? The attitude on here was like oh well we stink anyways. Totally unacceptable. We hung in with the Super bowl champs. We didn't win but it proves that we are not a bad team. You compared us to the bottom 5 of the league. Cmon.
socal I am not better than anyone here. You talk out of both sides of you mouth. As a Redskins fan, you weren't pissed off after the non holding call against rak?? The attitude on here was like oh well we stink anyways. Totally unacceptable. We hung in with the Super bowl champs. We didn't win but it proves that we are not a bad team. You compared us to the bottom 5 of the league. Cmon.
No all of Seattle penalties were justified. I will have to watch the game again to be sure. The Rak hold was more blatant than the Harvin play. I thought we had contact in the first 5 yards. If it was 8 yards then that doesn't trump the rak hold.
This is why you lack credibility. We did not "accept" the Rak call, we simply pointed out that crying over that call when there were multiple questionable calls that went our way, including a Redskins hold on the very same play, makes you look like a crying little bitch. Your response:
To claim that every call that went against Seattle was correct, and to somehow claim that the hold on Rak was a worse offense than a defensive hold downfield, is message board fail. A penalty is a penalty, there is no "worse offense", it don't work that way. They were both clear penalties and at best the we should have had offsetting penalties.
Is there any doubt that had the Redskins had not one, not two, but THREE TDs called back on penalties you would have been claiming that all the calls were correct. Not a chance in Hell you would ever post that. Therefore you have no credibility because you can not be objective.
By the way how's your QB savior working out?
Good reply. Actually - yesterday's game kind of clarifies the points. Yes - again - Orakpo was held several times & it was not called - kind of frustrating. However - just like with the Seahawks game - it was not the reason why the Redskins lost. This team has much bigger problems than worrying about the officiating.
Every time make a post like that I come back later, after the coffee has worn off, and think I should be more civil. It's hard to do with Dean, his openly cheering RGIII's injury is something I just can't get past. But later he admitted he was wrong on Cousins and that rarely happens on message boards so I gotta give him his propers for that
Every time make a post like that I come back later, after the coffee has worn off, and think I should be more civil. It's hard to do with Dean, his openly cheering RGIII's injury is something I just can't get past. But later he admitted he was wrong on Cousins and that rarely happens on message boards so I gotta give him his propers for that
Agree 100% & props to Dean for that. Also - I can pretty much understand any takes on this board since they are quite often emotional & we as Redskins fans have had to suffer through a lot of frustration.