PAC 12 Thread v6.0

[WizardHawk]

So now he's on about a page stating what the minimum standard to retain your eligibility at Stanford is and somehow suggesting it applies to actually getting into one of those programs in the first place?

Why does this not surprise me.

I mean it's obvious to anyone over the age of 5 there isn't a thing on that page about requirements to get into Stanford university. At all. It's 100% about how you get to stay there and remain in your sport or at least the minimums necessary to retain such.

There isn't one word about highschool transcripts nor a single bit of criteria for gaining entrance into the school in the first place.

Bad trolling is bad.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

So now he's on about a page stating what the minimum standard to retain your eligibility at Stanford is and somehow suggesting it applies to actually getting into one of those programs in the first place?

Why does this not surprise me.

I mean it's obvious to anyone over the age of 5 there isn't a thing on that page about requirements to get into Stanford university. At all. It's 100% about how you get to stay there and remain in your sport or at least the minimums necessary to retain such.

There isn't one word about highschool transcripts nor a single bit of criteria for gaining entrance into the school in the first place.

Bad trolling is bad.

Am I the only one here that reads and comprehends the English language? Tell me this group of PAC posters on here isn't that fvkn ignorant. The subject is the requirements for student athletes at Stanford, such as their football recruits.


NCAA Academic Eligibility Requirements | Stanford Undergrad

To be eligible to represent Stanford University in intercollegiate athletics competition, Stanford student-athletes must meet NCAA academic requirements and maintain satisfactory progress towards degrees as detailed below.

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE REQUIREMENTS AS A PDF

ALL STUDENTS - AT ALL TIMES*
*Requirements for Coterm Student-Athletes and Baseball/Football/Basketball Student-Athletes Below

• You must be enrolled in at least 12 units at all times – be sure to add classes before you drop
• Do not withdraw from a class or change the grading option without checking with your AARC advisor first
• Check with your AARC advisor when planning to repeat a class
• EACH quarter: you must pass 6 degree-applicable units
• CUMULATIVELY during the Fall, Winter, and Spring quarters: you must pass 27 degree-applicable units

What are degree-applicable units?

• Frosh & Sophomores: All units are degree-applicable
• Juniors & Seniors: degree-applicable units are a combination of GER, major, and elective classes. Contact your AARC advisor if you are not registered for at least 6 GER and major units. For other exceptions, please contact your AARC advisor.

REQUIRED PROGRESS BY YEAR
Note: Unit totals outlined below are "degree-applicable" units:

By the START of Sophomore Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 1.8
• have completed 36 units

By the END of Sophomore Year you must:

• declare a major

By the START of Junior Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 1.9
• have completed 72 units (40% of your total degree requirements)

By the START of Senior Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 2.0
• have completed 108 units (60% of your degree requirements)

By the START of a 5th Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 2.0
• have completed 144 units (80% of your degree requirements)

COTERMS - REQUIRED PROGRESS BY YEAR
In addition to the standard Sophomore year requirements listed above:

By the START of Junior Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 1.9
• have completed 33% of your degree requirements

By the START of Senior Year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 2.0
• have completed 50% of your degree requirements

By the START of your Coterm year you must:

• have a cumulative GPA of 2.0
• have completed 67% of your degree requirements

SPORT-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
BASEBALL
Must be eligible in the Fall Quarter in order to be eligible in the Winter and Spring Quarters

FOOTBALL
Must pass 8 degree-applicable units in the Fall Quarter to be eligible for the next season (Fall Quarter of the following year)

MEN & WOMEN'S BASKETBALL
In order to participate in summer practices, must be enrolled in summer courses at Stanford or be on 4-year academic plan (25% of total degree requirements by the start of sophomore year, 50% total degree requirements by the start of junior year, 75% of total degree requirements by the start of senior year)

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Pac-12 spring reset: Which QBs will step forward?

 

[WizardHawk]

AThe subject is the requirements for student athletes at Stanford, such as their football recruits.

So can you quote the EXACT language where it says a single thing about admissions into Stanford? That would be most helpful, because there isn't a single word in all you have posted thus far and yet you are claiming it is directly tied into it.

That web page simply states what requirement each student athlete must maintain as a minimum to RETAIN their status each year.

Show even just one tiny little piece for what requirements there are to get into the school in the first place. Others have asked for that and so far you cannot address them and just keep erroneously posting the same thing that doesn't say what you want it to over and over again which is why it's obvious you are just trolling.

Your premise that there isn't a smaller pool for Stanford to recruit from is ENTIRELY about admissions, not what is required to maintain status on their respective teams once in the school.

This really is elementary shit.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

So can you quote the EXACT language where it says a single thing about admissions into Stanford? That would be most helpful, because there isn't a single word in all you have posted thus far and yet you are claiming it is directly tied into it.

That web page simply states what requirement each student athlete must maintain as a minimum to RETAIN their status each year.

Show even just one tiny little piece for what requirements there are to get into the school in the first place. Others have asked for that and so far you cannot address them and just keep erroneously posting the same thing that doesn't say what you want it to over and over again which is why it's obvious you are just trolling.

Your premise that there isn't a smaller pool for Stanford to recruit from is ENTIRELY about admissions, not what is required to maintain status on their respective teams once in the school.

This really is elementary shit.

Hey stupid fvk, the question in doubt are the requirements for a Stanford football recruit. Now either you can read and comprehend English or you can't. If you can't read and comprehend basic English then kindly stfu.

 

[SUBuddha]

Folks, as Wiz pointed out, the link on their page is about maintaining eligibility. All Students who apply for admissions to Stanford (athletes included) must take at least 4 AP classes. This is in the written documentation sent to alumni interviewers. It is no where on their website, so it is clear that AG will not believe it.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Folks, as Wiz pointed out, the link on their page is about maintaining eligibility. All Students who apply for admissions to Stanford (athletes included) must take at least 4 AP classes. This is in the written documentation sent to alumni interviewers. It is no where on their website, so it is clear that AG will not believe it.

You think a non student athlete applying to Stanford goes by the NCAA requirements? You seriously can't be that fvkn stupid.

 

[TheDayMan]

Question for the board

 

[WizardHawk]

Hey stupid fvk, the question in doubt are the requirements for a Stanford football recruit. Now either you can read and comprehend English or you can't. If you can't read and comprehend basic English then kindly stfu.

Well you can't find even one person to support your idiocy. That should show you how dumb you are being, but we all know you are just trolling anyway so go ahead and get your mileage out of it while you can. I guess it's a slow day on that piece of shit PF board you normally get your jollies off on trolling.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Well you can't find even one person to support your idiocy. That should show you how dumb you are being, but we all know you are just trolling anyway so go ahead and get your mileage out of it while you can. I guess it's a slow day on that piece of shit PF board you normally get your jollies off on trolling.

I wasn't trolling so you can stfu. You're the same UW poster who stuck up for the little cocksucker Conner Weddington ... the kid that played for Scumner.

 

[TheDayMan]

I wasn't trolling so you can stfu.

So, you’re just legitimately that stupid...

I believe you.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

So, you’re just legitimately that stupid...

I believe you.

Say's the poster who does other dudes.

 

[WizardHawk]

I wasn't trolling so you can stfu. You're the same UW poster who stuck up for the little cocksucker Conner Weddington ... the kid that played for Scumner.

Yep, your typical playbook. When asked simple questions you can't answer because it would expose your stupid you resort to utter and complete nonsense in some ill-fated attempt to rile them up and make them forget they just exposed your stupid for the world to see.

 

[TheDayMan]

Say's the poster who does other dudes.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

 

[mrwallace2ku]

all i know about admission standards is that we kicked stanford's azz this past weekend in baseball…let that last game get away from us after a 6-1 lead, can't win em all i spose.

ONWERDZ!

 

[SUBuddha]

Notice OP has admitted he was wrong on the other thread but not here. Also still waiting for an answer to if he believes the UW student athletes only have to meet the minimum requirements for eligibility to enter rather than to stay at UW,

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Cracks are forming in the Pac-12: Will they be patched before it's too late?

Pac-12's Larry Scott highest paid commissioner in NCAA

 

[TheDayMan]

Cracks are forming in the Pac-12: Will they be patched before it's too late?

Pac-12's Larry Scott highest paid commissioner in NCAA

 

[AlaskaGuy]

It's PAC related and hasn't been posted on here tmk seeing how the story just came out today. If you have nothing constructive to add to it then probably best not to add shit.