Oh, yeah, and the basketball team is supposed to be pretty decent this year.
Final 4 or bust. That's how good they are this year.
Oh, yeah, and the basketball team is supposed to be pretty decent this year.
Cronin hasn't recruited for shit. 1 semi NBA talent. Whoopie freakin do.
I don't see it. Not now. Maybe before all this went down, but not now.My first thought when I read Pitino was out....Cronin would be a great hire for them. Stay tuned, I guess.
I think the big question they will have is depth. Really the only weakness on the team. If guys can get off the bench and contribute, this team has the talent.Final 4 or bust. That's how good they are this year.
When you can't consistently recruit 5* guys, you have to find guys who fit your scheme. Cronin has done a masterful job of finding guys who buy in on defense, and have been just good enough on offense. Past couple of years he's been getting guys who can score, and getting them to buy in defensively (Evans, Cumberland).Jacob Evans should be a good 3 and D guy once he declares.
Yeah, recruiting stars are nice and we all get suckered into them, but at the end the effort and toughness they put on the court ( especially on defense ), is what really matters.
I think the big question they will have is depth. Really the only weakness on the team. If guys can get off the bench and contribute, this team has the talent.
When you can't consistently recruit 5* guys, you have to find guys who fit your scheme. Cronin has done a masterful job of finding guys who buy in on defense, and have been just good enough on offense. Past couple of years he's been getting guys who can score, and getting them to buy in defensively (Evans, Cumberland).
Cincinnati was an Adidas school before signing the Under Armor Deal a few years back. Makes you wonder how close we could have come to getting caught up in this sort of thing. I'm not pointing fingers at Mick or anyone in our program - I think they appear to run a tight ship.... But these types of arrangements between shoe companies and coaching staffs are bound to lead to problems. And I'm sure there is some crazy shit that goes on at lots of big name schools that have been lucky to not catch the attention of the FBI.
Williams and Diarra should come in right away and contribute. Jennifer has his flaws but he's pretty useful defensively.
Yup. The offense has continuing trending up, which has been the programs Achilles heel for like... Forever.
But defensive always has to come first.
Cronin is as straight as an arrow. I remember he contemplating kicking Yancy freakin Gates off the team for that Xavier fight. No way he'll ever get caught up in shenanigans like this. There's no place for that at UC.
Williams and Diarra should come in right away and contribute. Jennifer has his flaws but he's pretty useful defensively.
Yup. The offense has continuing trending up, which has been the programs Achilles heel for like... Forever.
But defensive always has to come first.
Cronin is as straight as an arrow. I remember he contemplating kicking Yancy freakin Gates off the team for that Xavier fight. No way he'll ever get caught up in shenanigans like this. There's no place for that at UC.
Only reason UC ended up with Stephenson was because everyone thought he was ineligible and backed off. He had high major offers from Kansas, Duke, etc...and they all backed off because they were sure he wouldn't be able to play.
Really high on Williams and Trevor Moore. Word out of the early practices is that he's probably the best long-range shooter Mick as gotten while at UC. If you can get a kid off the bench who can defend and get to the rim in Williams, and also get a kid who can be a bit of instant offense in Moore...that can go a long way.
Another big key will be Clark being healthy. Apparently he was only about 70% most of last season as the ankle injury he sustained in his Soph. season lingered into last year. Finally got it cleaned out, and he said it's as if he never hurt it. So, hopefully that continues.
Let's face it, Mick is straight, by all accounts. However.....Even if he weren't, UC doesn't have that kind of coin. Not to compete with the likes of UK, Kansas, Duke, etc....etc...
Only reason UC ended up with Stephenson was because everyone thought he was ineligible and backed off. He had high major offers from Kansas, Duke, etc...and they all backed off because they were sure he wouldn't be able to play.
Honestly, I think one of the best sells to a mid-rated kid can be: Hey, yeah, we're only in the AAC, but that means you can come in, dominate the league, and we're always going to make the NCAA's (ok, not always, but you get it) and play on the major stage every year. That's where you make your name: NCAA's. Play well there, and your stock rises. Add that to dominating a league (even the AAC) and you can see where it becomes a viable option. These kids know they can play and get time at UC. At Kansas or Duke they are 3rd or 4th off the bench, at best.
Again, I want to be careful here, because I'm a big Bearcat fan and I'm a big Mick fan. The program is in incredible shape even against all odds given the conference issues. That's a minor miracle in my opinion.
But if we ever did get in trouble, it wouldn't be UC's coin.... It would be a shoe company, or a rich booster, or a rogue assistant coach. Same thing that sinks these other programs. The problem isn't necessarily unique to any one school - It's a problem that occurs because basketball is a big business masquerading as an amateur competition. Pitino himself had some haunting quotes about how shoe contracts were impacting recruiting. As long as coaches and programs continue to be able to make money at the expense of the athletes, this kind of shit is going to be likely.
Still, the minor schools are not going to be paying for these kids. These kids are top 25 in the country. There's only a few schools in the country who are, realistically, able to land these kids from the start. When you are offered 100K from Duke or 100K from UC...you're going to Duke. Not only that, companies are going to pour more money into those top 5-8 schools to land those guys, because down the line, they are going to recoup that money on the back end quickly.
UC simply isn't in position to do this. Not saying it can't happen, because it can. Just stating that it's highly unlikely.
It's not schools paying for kids. It's coaches swinging deals with shoe companies and financial advisors to get bribe money and to pass money off to kids. One of the main programs in the complaint is Auburn - Hardly a traditional basketball power. This isn't about the old payoff to play for a program....This has more to do with people trying to pay players now for relationships in the future. Wherever you can find a pro prospect there will be potential for fraud.