- Thread starter
- #1
Likewall32
Active Member
Its kinda boring around here, so why the hell not. Ive always been curious about this, so shit why not ask.. In sports now a days it always seems to be an enfeses (yea that spelling is way off) on size... Like when you draft a youngen and people are like yea he needs to add more muscle, size etc... even like with Vlasics latest staements on what he wants to add or pack on. My question is, when or if does adding the muscle/size hinder the production? Do you believe is does, or do you always think bulking up will always make a good player better?... Its somethng ive always been curious about. Why? Mostly because im a pretty small shrimp. Ive posted how i made it to the "E" before but didnt get anywhere, but im also a goalie,and IMO Ive always felt that, yes Im pretty small by atheletic comparisons, but I dont think I wouldve got as far as I did if I had packed it on. Ive always felt that although tiny, if I bulked up ( which is ahrd for me to do anyway) it would hinder my reflex speed & movement. Do you agree or disagree with this? Because I dont agree that bigger = better... And I have neved liked that being thown onto players, because honestly, in any sport the smaller natural built atheletes are always the top ones... So why does every sport want everyone to get bigger?
Jus curious, since, im bored, and of course drunk lol...
Jus curious, since, im bored, and of course drunk lol...