OK bks, we can do this the easy way or the hard way

[bksballer89]

Due to the injuries….not so much

The pacers series was way too close in particular

Pacers make me sick. No way in hell that shouldn't have been a best of 3 following game 4

 

[The Q]

Pacers make me sick. No way in hell that shouldn't have been a best of 3 following game 4

To be fair they needed to beat literally half of a Knicks roster and they went 7

Knicks fans are the ones who should be sick

 

[bksballer89]

You can easily post what I said just as I did. You either have it or you dont

Not that complicated

 

[bksballer89]

To be fair they needed to beat literally half of a Knicks roster and they went 7

Knicks fans are the ones who should be sick

That too but Pacers can't lose G1. Up 3 with 10 or under less and you have the ball? That game can't get to OT then i think it was game 3 where they had nearly an 10 point lead with under 3 to go. Those are 2 games you simply can't lose

 

[msgkings322]

Due to the injuries….not so much

The pacers series was way too close in particular

Well I mean, if you can only have fun when your team is KD Warriors level you'll hardly ever have fun lol

Even in 2022 I was talking shit, and there was any number of teams that could have won. Heck the Celtics could have won that title with a couple breaks.

 

[msgkings322]

You can easily post what I said just as I did. You either have it or you dont

Not that complicated

This whole board knows what's up dude...I'm talking my trash now, as earned by the ancient rules of sports talk.

 

[Shanemansj13]

All you gotta do is answer two questions simply and honestly, and we can move on

Or you can resist, and who knows what happens then?

1. Which poster here said the Celtics were going to win the title, starting in February?

I said this at the beginning of the season so what do I get?

 

[msgkings322]

To be fair I barely talk trash about uconn


And they won national titles in April of 2023 and 2024


If you hadn’t heard already…

I had no idea! Are they a pretty good team usually?

 

[msgkings322]

I said this at the beginning of the season so what do I get?

Did you? Mine's posted here, where's yours?

 

[The Q]

I had no idea! Are they a pretty good team usually?

After 5 years that resembled the dark ages….yes

 

[tlance]

This is my conundrum


I will talk shit and then chew my fingers off during the games

That is tough.

What do you type with?

 

[tlance]

That too but Pacers can't lose G1. Up 3 with 10 or under less and you have the ball? That game can't get to OT then i think it was game 3 where they had nearly an 10 point lead with under 3 to go. Those are 2 games you simply can't lose

Ok…

But the Celtics are far superior team who had a reputation for playing down and taking nights off occasionally. Like game 4.

If the Pacers win game 1, you really think the Celtics play down again in game 3?

I don’t.

 

[broncosmitty]

To be fair they needed to beat literally half of a Knicks roster and they went 7

Knicks fans are the ones who should be sick

And got a bye essentially in the first round.

No way in fuck they easily handle the Bucks if Giannis can play.

Changed the whole playoffs in the East.

 

[broncosmitty]

Boston this year was a historically competitive team.


But that was a got damned cake walk they got the last two months.

Not taking anything away. Just saying. Nugs V Celts would’ve been a good one.

The Mavs were led by a fat kid and a dude who is his worst enemy.

 

[broncosmitty]

Not historically great.

Historically competitive.

Which is still impressive. But prolly not usually winning in 5. With basically zero doubt the entire time.

 

[tlance]

Not historically great.

Historically competitive.

Which is still impressive. But prolly not usually winning in 5. With basically zero doubt the entire time.

Yeah that is my take also.

Good enough to challenge a historically great team.

Not historically great on their own.

I would call them above average compared to all the other champs of the past 30 years.

 

[bksballer89]

Ok…

But the Celtics are far superior team who had a reputation for playing down and taking nights off occasionally. Like game 4.

If the Pacers win game 1, you really think the Celtics play down again in game 3?

I don’t.

Valid point well pacers shouldn’t have got swept

 

[msgkings322]

That is tough.

What do you type with?

You don’t wanna know

 

[The Q]

You don’t wanna know

I knew this exercises would come in handy….

 

[The Q]

Boston this year was a historically competitive team.


But that was a got damned cake walk they got the last two months.

Not taking anything away. Just saying. Nugs V Celts would’ve been a good one.

The Mavs were led by a fat kid and a dude who is his worst enemy.

Yeah that is my take also.

Good enough to challenge a historically great team.

Not historically great on their own.

I would call them above average compared to all the other champs of the past 30 years.

They would wipe the floor with most teams


Like those shoddy frauds the 2010 lakers