63bears40
New Member
so I have a question....the thread was started under the guise of being hating Tucker, but most of the comments are about bad play by players, not scheme. Do you think Tucker is responsible for the bad play, or the talent just isn't there?
I'm sort of neutral on Tucker at the moment. As you guys know I was nervous about D line depth before the season, and that's not really Tucker's fault. Plus I liked the way the D started the season out. The fact that the defensive roster has suffered mightily with injuries, and doesn't have the depth to take it...is this something you hate Tucker for?
What defensive schemes do you think we should be doing differently? I'm asking, not forcing an argument...I'd like to hear your takes. Not gripes about Shea (is anyone REALLY surprised he can't defend the run as a defensive end?)..but rather what's Tucker doing wrong?
When our D was somewhat healthy, Tucker couldn't find a scheme, to stop or at least somewhat contain the oppositions top play makers. Green week 1, Peterson & Jennings week 2, Brown week 3,etc.etc....
Just saying most competent DCs find a way to slow down or take away game breakers.
He (Tucker) hasn't done anything to show me he's qualified for the DC job.
Injuries give him an excuse for now. But Rods still getting a pass rush w/ guys off the street in Dallas .
Tucker came in here w/ a rep for defending the pass, much like Tice as a O-line guru.
We saw how Tice worked out. Tucker is headed in the same direction. He took a top 5 D all the way to 25. He deserves a lot of the blame.