- Thread starter
- #1
27mtrcougar
Well-Known Member
Reports are that NFL teams would rather have Sam then take a chance on J.Winston or MM. Wow seems Sam has market value. Where have we heard this before...
Only from you Cougar.
This is why I said trading for Foles is dumb. A lot of teams would love Sam. He should be our starter next season and we should have a young guy behind him learning.
Well having Sam and Foles would be good plan but the Eagles aren't going to trade him. I would really be surprised if they did.
I will say again for everyone to hear... Sam Bradford, assuming health, will be the Rams starter in 2015. According to Jim Thomas of the Post Dispatch, discussions have already begun to restructure Sam's deal to cut the cap money in half and set the rest as incentives. I would be VERY ok with that.
Beyond Sam, I have a gut feeling that Jake Locker will end up being the "competition from outside the building" but will ultimately be the backup. Then they will draft Grayson or Petty as a #3. No Hill, no Davis... please and thank you.
Tis true shops but IMO he wasn't ready last year.He has more time than he did last year, so he should be ready.
Tis true shops but IMO he wasn't ready last year.
Sometimes its better the devil you know. We should have made a move for a QB last year. Its pretty dam slim pickens this year. That being said who knows if Bradford will even be ready for the opener?
Well I assume if they're redoing the deal they'll make his contract and extend it so he'll get security for the new deal
That article says the Rams WANT to restructure his contract? I haven't seen anything that says they are actually talking yet?
JT tweeted early this morning that Bradford's agent will be at Rams Park today to continue discussions that started over the weekend. It is going to get done.