Southieinnc
Do Your Job!
It was not "indisputable evidence" that he was touched.....
It was not "indisputable evidence" that he was touched.....
that down by contact rule needs to be changed pitta made no attempt to touch him.
i can safely say pitta made no intent to touch him. he was falling to the ground in the other direction.The line of touched or not can be conclusively determined by replay. The line of intentional or not can't be.
Yes it was. His foot clearly touched him... Heck his entire backside hit Pita... It was the correct call.
The jersey never moved.....
He was on the ground with pitta under him. There's no possible way there was no contact.
He was on the ground with pitta under him. There's no possible way there was no contact.
The shirt never moved. It was very close and a home field call.....