Mock Draft Chat

[Nosferatu]

Believeland

Smellslikepissland

 

[femurov]

Season isn't over. Go eat a big bag of dicks

Your season in the Guillotine League is. If you pay me, you can keep the bag of dicks and eat them yourself.

 

[Nosferatu]

Your season in the Guillotine League is. If you pay me, you can keep the bag of dicks and eat them yourself.

I'd wish you good luck but....

 

[femurov]

I'd wish you good luck but....

Yeah... at this point everyone has a stacked team, so it really will come down to luck.

 

[UK Cowboy]

How about for NBA we do a cut down draft. Each GM drafts a player from each of the ten drafts of 2000-2009. Then the next ten rounds we draft any ten players drafted before 2000. So then each GM has 20 players. You then have to cut your roster down to 10 players...the catch is, your entire 10 man final roster can't have averaged more than 130 points per game combined. Also, your final 10 players play one half per player.

 

[Nosferatu]

How about for NBA we do a cut down draft. Each GM drafts a player from each of the ten drafts of 2000-2009. Then the next ten rounds we draft any ten players drafted before 2000. So then each GM has 20 players. You then have to cut your roster down to 10 players...the catch is, your entire 10 man final roster can't have averaged more than 130 points per game combined. Also, your final 10 players play one half per player.

Fuck yeah! I love the 130 aspect


Dammit, I hate to say this but do we really need to draft 20 if we are only gonna play 10? That feels like we are making the draft longer for no reason.

 

[UK Cowboy]

Fuck yeah! I love the 130 aspect


Dammit, I hate to say this but do we really need to draft 20 if we are only gonna play 10? That feels like we are making the draft longer for no reason.

It doesn't matter. I just thought we would do no adds or drops and you had to use the 20 you have to cut to 10. I think it would make it hard for some guys to just let go of a 30 ppg guy than to not draft him at all. I also think it would make for a ton of trade possibilities. I'm down with drafting ten if you prefer, but to quote a really good friend of mine...you in a hurry?

 

[Mookie]

Happy Thanksgiving fellas! hope you all have a great day

 

[Shanemansj13]

So what's next?

 

[Nosferatu]

So what's next?

 

[MilkSpiller22]

how about 1990-2000 WS champions!!!

 

[tducey]

A World Series champ draft would be good. The same yrs. as we just did for NFL.

 

[Shanemansj13]

how about 1990-2000 WS champions!!!

Expand the years and that time frame would be awful!

18 players, 18 years. I would like to do years where champions aren't repetitive for the most part.

1978-1996

Only 1-2 repeaters in that time frame.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Expand the years and that time frame would be awful!

18 players, 18 years. I would like to do years where champions aren't repetitive for the most part.

1978-1995

Only 1-2 repeaters in that time frame.

what should I have done 1996-2000 instead???

 

[Shanemansj13]

what should I have done 1996-2000 instead???

10 years (would be 11 but strike year)

Yankees - 4
Blue Jays - 2

So 6 of the 10 years were repeater champions lol. Cmon man

 

[Shanemansj13]

Changed it to 96 to make you happy...since strike year would make it only 17

 

[UK Cowboy]

Expand the years and that time frame would be awful!

18 players, 18 years. I would like to do years where champions aren't repetitive for the most part.

1978-1996

Only 1-2 repeaters in that time frame.

I honestly hated the draft we are in. It was choosing between 7-8 teams half with different schemes

What about a bucket draft

4 players that won multiple world series.
4 players that won one world series
4 players who lost in the world series but never won one
4 HOF who never played in a world series
4 AS non HOF that never played in a world series
4 non AS that never played in a WS

No year restrictions

 

[tducey]

Yeah, the last draft was my idea. I really wish it would have covered 1970 to 2009 instead of 1970 to 1999.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

I honestly hated the draft we are in. It was choosing between 7-8 teams half with different schemes

What about a bucket draft

4 players that won multiple world series.
4 players that won one world series
4 players who lost in the world series but never won one
4 HOF who never played in a world series
4 AS non HOF that never played in a world series
4 non AS that never played in a WS

No year restrictions

make it 3 per bucket not 4... and I think this is good...

although, year restrictions would have to be valid for that last bucket...

 

[Shanemansj13]

I honestly hated the draft we are in. It was choosing between 7-8 teams half with different schemes

What about a bucket draft

4 players that won multiple world series.
4 players that won one world series
4 players who lost in the world series but never won one
4 HOF who never played in a world series
4 AS non HOF that never played in a world series
4 non AS that never played in a WS

No year restrictions

Fine with me, gives us more to choose from. Bucket drafts are always fun. I love new ideas but picking from the Steelers, Cowboys, 49ers and Redskins teams got old...quick.