Nope. It's right here in the thread . 10 autobids. Using real conference records and then using Massey pre ccg. You're still in the mindset of 12 games and a CCG.
No one is removing the games of choice . It's using teams actual conference records and then looking at ooc to see if they have likely won't or lost an average ooc game then actual composite cankibfs to select at large teams . It's not guess work . It's what actually happened lol .
And you STILL won't answer the actual question asked. How many total viewers across the entire tournament. It was a simple question. I did the entire math for you across all of college football post seasons. What was the entire total viewership across 63 games of that tournament, vs the 31 or whatever of college football?
Why is that relevant? I already stated more people watch CFB PER game . And more watch CBB in total . That's the entire premise . Expanding the playoff would increase viewership over the shitty bowl games . You're trying to prove something I already stated as factual lol
Yeah, because teams wouldn't play things out any differently at all in your world, vs reality.
Yeah, because show me where I said that's where I was headed.
Now you will refuse to go along because of giant assumptions you are making. That really shouldn't surprise me because your entire fallacious pipe dream is riddled with weird assumptions. It's kind of your thing.
Simple . You take their existing conference record . Look at who they didn't play as crossover and where those teams rank in Massey to determine probability of then winning a random game .Yeah, because teams wouldn't play things out any differently at all in your world, vs reality.
First of all, how did you equate schedules when SEC teams played 8 conf games and your dream world has them playing 9? You rank/rate them on entirely different criteria in your little sample. So it had made up bullshit. Then, you assumed which OOC games to drop for each. Now schools will for sure view how to use that game entirely differently than they do now, but let's not let that get in the way.
Your whole premise is a mess man. And thank freaking God it won't ever happen because it would be the end of college football.
Tell me why what you're looking for is relevant and I'll do it . I already provided links to vieweship for 3 of the 6 rounds that equate to the entire viewership of the bowl season.Yeah, because show me where I said that's where I was headed.
More piles of assumptions masked as facts.
Declaring victors now based off rankings and likelihoods of outcomes on games you decide they might have played in crossover? Because upsets simply don't happen. And here's a clue for you: SEC teams fail to play a LOT of teams from their other division. So you drew straws. And call that close enough.
You're only factoring probability for 10% of the games for 20% of teams . It's a low number in total and even if you assumed losses you still wouldn't have any 5 loss teams in the playoff ( which is where this all began ). You asked s question and I provided an answer . Of course you can't KNOW the outcome of a dmsll number of games that never happened but you can use data to make an educated guess . In any event the expanded playoff would never feature a 5-5 team, rarely ( if ever ) a 6-4 team and would have relatively few 7-3 teams . To say otherwise is to ignore actual results and mathematical probabilityMore piles of assumptions masked as facts.
I mean really?
There isn't any way at all to even guess what might have been last year under such a vastly different (and frankly retarded) system. You don't have any clue how teams would schedule their one and only free game. You don't have any clue how differently they would play games or situations because of all of the radical changes to the landscape of the sport.
You really haven't thought this through if you believe everything else stays 100% the same after you chop up the regular season, drop all CCG's, eliminate every bowl game, throw out all of that revenue for lost home games, destroy the budgets of chunks of mid major and even FCS teams, and create a welfare tournament.
Entirely out of your mind.
First of all, I made no such blanket claim. So there's that.
No, instead he arbitrarily picked a team from the other division you didn't play and then counted it as a win/loss based on rankings lol.
You use actual conference records , compare cross overs not played with likelihood of winning those games ( per the rankings ) and factor from there . In any event there's no team finishing 5- 5 and getting in and even 6-4 is remote although I wouldn't say impossible ( but I highly unlikely )
Ok, since you just won't look things up yourself, I'll give you another sneak peek here. Consider the following and tell me again about your numbers:
