- 171,949
- 53,195
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 401,515.02
And the joke went over your head, surprising nobody.you can't find such football brilliance just anywhere.
And the joke went over your head, surprising nobody.you can't find such football brilliance just anywhere.
June 17th, there will be more kickers from the UFL available (Bates). Probably just needed someone to get them through mini camp.Commanders sign Ramiz Ahmed to replace McManus. I would have signed 2 kickers to compete and Ahmed is avg. He only got his shot in the UFL because Chris Blewitt (we know him and he sucks) was injured.
And as such he shouldn’t have been cut before adjudication of his case . He was innocent. His livelyhood taken away by cowardice of the women who falsely accused him and a FO bending the knee to wokiesm ( I.e. me too movement ) before the presumed innocent man had his day in court . The women will get off Scott free by the way
he should sue the fuck out of them.make them well known.And as such he shouldn’t have been cut before adjudication of his case . He was innocent. His livelyhood taken away by cowardice of the women who falsely accused him and a FO bending the knee to wokiesm ( I.e. me too movement ) before the presumed innocent man had his day in court . The women will get off Scott free by the way
You are right , however my contention is the sameSexual assault suit vs. ex-Jag McManus dismissed
They are refiling using their names in 10 days. This case is far from over.
I think his cut is the result of the snyder years and the new regime is trying to get away from that. I think if McManus was employed by a majority of other teams they would have better benefit of the doubt PR wise.You are right , however my contention is the same
must have great evidence or they would have just settled.The case was dismissed because the accusers refuse to use their real names, not because McManus is innocent.
must have great evidence or they would have just settled.
they are bound to have something credible.I have no idea about the evidence. From what I have seen, there is no evidence, and the entire case is based on she said he said. Supposedly, there is an eye witness from the Jags team but he has never been named.
As for this dismissal, it is obvious..
they are bound to have something credible.
lawyers I know usually don,tho for lost causes,beleive it or not.Why? Until men start suing for slander, women have nothing to lose by lying.