fredsdeadfriend
Well-Known Member
Tommy West's years, Tommy Bowden's years and the first 3 years of Dabo. Just ONE season with less than 4 losses, a 3 loss season.What time frame are you referring to? It certainly isn't the last 18 years.
Tommy West's years, Tommy Bowden's years and the first 3 years of Dabo. Just ONE season with less than 4 losses, a 3 loss season.What time frame are you referring to? It certainly isn't the last 18 years.
80s and 90s is a LONG TIME ago, wouldn't you say?
Tommy West's years, Tommy Bowden's years and the first 3 years of Dabo. Just ONE season with less than 4 losses, a 3 loss season.
15 years before Dabo took over where Clemson was not much better than Minnesota was from 2003 to 2017.What time frame are you referring to? It certainly isn't the last 18 years.
A long LONG time ago. Titles in the 30s and 40s are about as relevant to young recruits as titles in the 80s and 90s. A lot of people on this forum weren't born yet in 1981 when Clemson won their last Title pre-Dabo.When were Minnesota's CFB National Titles?
Cherry picking years works just fine when making a legitimate point, DUHSo you cherry-picked years to suit your interest, instead of picking a logical timeframe.
Sounds about right.
When were Minnesota's CFB National Titles?
15 years before Dabo took over where Clemson was not much better than Minnesota was from 2003 to 2017.
Dabo needed 4 years to get it down to less than 2 losses.
A long LONG time ago. Titles in the 30s and 40s are about as relevant to young recruits as titles in the 80s and 90s. A lot of people on this forum weren't born yet in 1981 when Clemson won their last Title pre-Dabo.
You are aone thick headed stubborn person, ain't ya? lol Wow, the lengths some people will go to to remain wrong, is funny.Clemson doesn't have to rely on titles from the 80s/90s. They have titles from the past decade.
That is not relevant to the topic, dude. Try turning on your brain for a minute.In the past 45 seasons, there have only been 4 years when Minnesota had fewer losses than Clemson.
Your definition of "not much better" is laughable.
That is not relevant to the topic, dude. Try turning on your brain for a minute.
College football championship history
Here is a comprehensive list of every college football champion from 1869 to the present day.www.ncaa.com
Dude, I don't need to look at that link, Minnesota's SIX RECOGNIZED Titles came in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1940, 1941 and 1960. Their unrecognized Titles came in 1903, 1904, 1911 & 1915.
Dude, I don't need to look at that link, Minnesota's SIX RECOGNIZED Titles came in 1934, 1935, 1936, 1940, 1941 and 1960. Their unrecognized Titles came in 1903, 1904, 1911 & 1915.
I claimed, if you could comprehend simple english, that Clemson for THAT SPECIFIC 15 year period, the 15 years just prior to Dabo taking over, was not much better than Minnesota in the 15 years prior to PJ Fleck showing up.You claimed Clemson has not been "much better" than Minnesota. Obviously that is false.
I don't care how many the NCAA claims schools have. The NCAA didn't exist until the late 1930s and weren't even recognized as the official anything until the 40s.How many did you see?
What’s next a Yale fan coming in to chirp????