How the hell did you get a #117 ranked player with your #252 pick?? I would call that an A+ not an A. Over, I like it.
Because he was a most recent addition to the draft profile - he's not been around long enough yet to shoot up the boards. It's a "glitch" of the PFF system.How the hell did you get a #117 ranked player with your #252 pick?? I would call that an A+ not an A. Over, I like it.
I still think if you can get a trade with the Jets for their 2nd this year, and 1st next year for Bates, and attain a safety like Cine or Cross with that early second round pick we should probably go for it. Re-up Bell for another 3 years, let him tutor the new kid, see what we can do with extending Burrow, Higgins and Wilson instead of spending the money on Bates.
In that scenario, if we had done that trade with the Jets, get Alec Pierce with the other 2nd round pick.
Also, while I don't disagree with getting more for Bates than a Comp pick - I also realize the window to win is right now. As good as some of these other kids may be, they are not currently Bates level good. I think you have to weigh that option as well when looking towards what to do.How the hell did you get a #117 ranked player with your #252 pick?? I would call that an A+ not an A. Over, I like it.
I still think if you can get a trade with the Jets for their 2nd this year, and 1st next year for Bates, and attain a safety like Cine or Cross with that early second round pick we should probably go for it. Re-up Bell for another 3 years, let him tutor the new kid, see what we can do with extending Burrow, Higgins and Wilson instead of spending the money on Bates.
In that scenario, if we had done that trade with the Jets, get Alec Pierce with the other 2nd round pick.
True enough. I just look at who is due for contracts, and the way we have been hitting on the draft and spending in FA, the roster is getting expensive quick. I guess I would rather have Wilson over Bates if I had to choose which defensive player to spend money on.Also, while I don't disagree with getting more for Bates than a Comp pick - I also realize the window to win is right now. As good as some of these other kids may be, they are not currently Bates level good. I think you have to weigh that option as well when looking towards what to do.
Plus, they can still tag him 1 more time. Not ideal - but still an option.
I think you need to factor in Bates having a bad season this year.... He admitted himself that he didn't do well for most of the year because he was thinking about the contract. He was terrific in the postseason, but I think the stakes were a little different at that point. The Bengals won't do it, but if they were offered a first for Bates, they should take it as soon as humanly possible. Yes, it could be bad for morale.... But I'm not sure it will be better to have him pouting on day 1 of the season.Also, while I don't disagree with getting more for Bates than a Comp pick - I also realize the window to win is right now. As good as some of these other kids may be, they are not currently Bates level good. I think you have to weigh that option as well when looking towards what to do.
Plus, they can still tag him 1 more time. Not ideal - but still an option.
If he's going to pout because he's getting $12.9 million guaranteed for this season to be the leader of the defense on a potential Super Bowl team, then I don't want him to ever play another game for this team.I think you need to factor in Bates having a bad season this year.... He admitted himself that he didn't do well for most of the year because he was thinking about the contract. He was terrific in the postseason, but I think the stakes were a little different at that point. The Bengals won't do it, but if they were offered a first for Bates, they should take it as soon as humanly possible. Yes, it could be bad for morale.... But I'm not sure it will be better to have him pouting on day 1 of the season.
A first? Yeah. I'd take that.I think you need to factor in Bates having a bad season this year.... He admitted himself that he didn't do well for most of the year because he was thinking about the contract. He was terrific in the postseason, but I think the stakes were a little different at that point. The Bengals won't do it, but if they were offered a first for Bates, they should take it as soon as humanly possible. Yes, it could be bad for morale.... But I'm not sure it will be better to have him pouting on day 1 of the season.
Yeah, it is pretty hokie. I have been seeing posts from Bills fans now thinking and wanting the Bills to draft Araiza at the end of the 4th round. His stock is rising, not holding steady to a 6th to 7th round selection.Two things I don't like about the PFF simulator:
You draft a kid around his slot and get a D grade....really?
Rounds 6-7 are nothing but QB's and HB's....
Yeah.... What I don't get is that even if you draft what they say is your needs (they say we need a G and C), with a player that is ranked above the slot you take him and you still get a B or lower. It's weird.Two things I don't like about the PFF simulator:
You draft a kid around his slot and get a D grade....really?
Rounds 6-7 are nothing but QB's and HB's....
Maybe its because all of our draft experts stopped posting.Upon a quick review of this thread I don’t see that any of us selected anyone that the bengals chose.
Great job guys!
Hey, I know for a fact I had the kid from Toledo.Upon a quick review of this thread I don’t see that any of us selected anyone that the bengals chose.
Great job guys!