Series Thread: LA Clippers vs San Antonio Spurs

[ElTexan]

Spurs had last shot with 13.3 seconds left... Ref interjected himself by calling a non-foul foul, and gave final shot to Clippers.

Ridiculous. Stupid. The NBA is an idiotic league and has been for decades.

 

[gordontrue]

Spurs had last shot with 13.3 seconds left... Ref interjected himself by calling a non-foul foul, and gave final shot to Clippers.

Ridiculous. Stupid. The NBA is an idiotic league and has been for decades.

Wait... so you're mad that the ref gave Duncan 2 free throws to tie the game? The Spurs are not gonna wait to take the last shot when they're down by 2... especially with the way they'd been getting offensive rebounds.

 

[ElTexan]

Wait... so you're mad that the ref gave Duncan 2 free throws to tie the game? The Spurs are not gonna wait to take the last shot when they're down by 2... especially with the way they'd been getting offensive rebounds.

No, dunce.

Spurs had LAST SHOT with 13.3 seconds left.... until a mystery foul was given in C Paul's shot.

Then they gave a make-up call on the other end.

But guess what... that gave the CLIPPERS the last shot instead of the Spurs having the legitimate last shot.

 

[gordontrue]

No, dunce.

Spurs had LAST SHOT with 13.3 seconds left.... until a mystery foul was given in C Paul's shot.

Then they gave a make-up call on the other end.

But guess what... that gave the CLIPPERS the last shot instead of the Spurs having the legitimate last shot.

Gotcha. Wasn't very clear on your original post. Still, that's a bit of an odd route to take for a conspiracy theorist.

Mad about 1 foul call that was immediately followed by an even more questionable call in your team's favor because your team could've attempted a game winning shot at the buzzer. Still weird.

 

[bksballer89]

Gotcha. Wasn't very clear on your original post. Still, that's a bit of an odd route to take for a conspiracy theorist.

Mad about 1 foul call that was immediately followed by an even more questionable call in your team's favor because your team could've attempted a game winning shot at the buzzer. Still weird.

agree. The BS call they gave the Spurs was actually more of a non call than the whistle the clips got on the previous play. Both weren't fouls

 

[69er]

Sorry but looking at the overall series, I felt A LOT of calls when Spurs way and what kept them in the series all along. Not going to let it take away from how great the series was but a little part of me wanted the Clipps to move on to the next round for that reason alone.

 

[ElTexan]

agree. The BS call they gave the Spurs was actually more of a non call than the whistle the clips got on the previous play. Both weren't fouls

How is that weird?

Spurs had the last shot... and the refs gave it to the Clips... that's a WORLD of difference.

 

[gordontrue]

How is that weird?

Spurs had the last shot... and the refs gave it to the Clips... that's a WORLD of difference.

You have to admit... your strategy to claim that calling a foul in your team's favor is how the ref's screwed you over... is pretty unique... even for a conspiracy theorist.