- Thread starter
- #1
Depends on the guaranteed portion. The overall number rarely matters as contracts rarely reach their maturity. Players either renegotiate or the get cut before the contract expires.
Will Kirk Cousins’ new contract be a cap killer for the Redskins?
Good article. this is very fair. Cousins’ cap numbers would go up from year to year. Let’s say his deal is for four years and $72 million, an average of $18 million. After that first-year cap hit of $10 million the cap hits could go $17 million in 2017 and then $19 million and $21 million. The remaining $5 million could go into a dummy fifth year that is voidable and would create a dead cap charge in 2020.
That is every QB. That is the problem with these contracts...only a few QBs warrant them but everybody now gets paid like they are great. Eventually, the NFL will get these under control as well.
Big QB contracts strangle a team's cap, that's the only good thing about not having a good QB. I for the life of me can't understand how Denver has all those defensive stars while still absorbing Peyton's deal.
Big QB contracts strangle a team's cap, that's the only good thing about not having a good QB. I for the life of me can't understand how Denver has all those defensive stars while still absorbing Peyton's deal.
Not really. The NFL is a victim of its own success in this situation. They employee a group of people with a severely subjective skill set. They deal with a unionized labor force. They could try and take measures to control player salaries, but the contract they signed has them bound to shell out a certain portion of the profits to the players union. Sure they could try and lower QB salaries, but the union would simply strike and then the NFL actually stands to lose money. In the grand scheme of things, you over pay a QB by $10 million to facilitate each team making $500 million at the end of the day.
Problem is everytime you lower a contract to sign other players you add guaranteed money on the back end of the player "Giving you a Break"They can lower the QB contracts while raising contracts of other players.
This is the reason hitting on a first round QB who wins the job by year two can be contenders right away. They aren't paying the QB 1/5th of their cap money, and can afford talent elsewhere.All starting QB's get paid more than they're worth. Washington will be no different with Cousins as he will look overpaid on the surface but they need him and I'm ok with whatever he gets
Problem is everytime you lower a contract to sign other players you add guaranteed money on the back end of the player "Giving you a Break"
Players don't simply take less the take the cut as guaranteed money three years later. The person who manages the cap for each team may have the toughest job in the organization.
I think you are missing GK's point. He isnt talking about reworking a contract. He is basically saying he thinks that these guys are over paid period and that teams should start trying to lower the over all contract rate for any given position. He would have a Starting QB play for around $10-12 million per year, and to stay within the rules of the salary cap minimum spending, raise the amount that you pay other players. I think what he is hinting at is a system where in you have 53 players on a roster and a cap figure of $135 million spent, the average per year salary would be $2.55 million a year per player. Then when you get into the range of your stud players, they might make the $5-7 million per year average.
It kinda irks him that the market will dictate a guy like Cousins gets paid $20 million a year on average.
If that was his point yes I missed it and agree, but I read his post as redoing the QB's contract to free money for other players. It is SOP for all teams.
All starting QB's get paid more than they're worth. Washington will be no different with Cousins as he will look overpaid on the surface but they need him and I'm ok with whatever he gets
That sounds great in theory. The reality is that it would take all 32 teams to collude to make that happen. As long as there is less than 32 franchise QBs in the league, then the laws of supply and demand take precedence and someone will be willing to pay more than the rest of the league wants.I think you are missing GK's point. He isnt talking about reworking a contract. He is basically saying he thinks that these guys are over paid period and that teams should start trying to lower the over all contract rate for any given position. He would have a Starting QB play for around $10-12 million per year, and to stay within the rules of the salary cap minimum spending, raise the amount that you pay other players. I think what he is hinting at is a system where in you have 53 players on a roster and a cap figure of $135 million spent, the average per year salary would be $2.55 million a year per player. Then when you get into the range of your stud players, they might make the $5-7 million per year average.
It kinda irks him that the market will dictate a guy like Cousins gets paid $20 million a year on average.