Rowdy
Well-Known Member
Rumor is they’re signing WJ lll
Kinda.So Whitt n Quinn upon examining the roster from last year. Decided that the best CB on the team in Fuller, who can play both in the slot n outside. As well as Curl, who W/O question was the best player to come out of the Riverboat era. Were both deemed so undesirable. They won't worth signing to those cut rate pennies on the contracts they signed with their new teams.
But White n Quinn somehow looked at Forbes, St Justed n every other DB on the team last year. And thought. Yeah, now we can work with these guys.
Is that what you're telling me, Duke?
They looked at Forbes and said, he was a rookie that would cost us 12 million to cut. Then we would have to replapace him with another 8 million in Fuller…that would be 20 million to cut Forbes. Forbes also can improve, as many second or third year players do.
They look at BSJ and see a player who has had mixed results, a big corner. He is also extremely cheap and young.
They see Fuller as a 30 year old with minimal upside. Rather than spend 8 million on a player WE fans obviously overrate, as evidenced by the contract he ended up receiving, we can spend it elsewhere or save that money.
I understand the Fuller scinero but what about Curl? He is 25.
In fairness, Chinn has had the best season of the two. He was misused badly in Carolina.
That's some creative math for sure. We'll see how many games Forbes cot the Skins next year if they trot his ass out there as a starter. For no other reason than he's young or his cap hit is big.They looked at Forbes and said, he was a rookie that would cost us 12 million to cut. Then we would have to replapace him with another 8 million in Fuller…that would be 20 million to cut Forbes. Forbes also can improve, as many second or third year players do.
They look at BSJ and see a player who has had mixed results, a big corner. He is also extremely cheap and young.
Fuller was rated the 3rd highest CB in FA and the 15th highest rated player in FA period. I'm not overrating him, he isn't getting fitted for any gold jackets or making any all pro teams. He can play though, better than both Forbes n BSJ can and that didn't change regardless of what Quinn or Whit think.They see Fuller as a 30 year old with minimal upside. Rather than spend 8 million on a player WE fans obviously overrate, as evidenced by the contract he ended up receiving, we can spend it elsewhere or save that money.
Finally! A real answer.In fairness, Chinn has had the best season of the two. He was misused badly in Carolina.
Ah, yeah, we can. You and Duke argued the entire time Riverboat was HC. You'd think after all that time and with the way things ultimately worked out. You of all people would've recognized that.Yes, Chinn has upside no doubt about it. If that is who Quinn wanted, we can't argue.
Finally! A real answer.
Oh and just forr shits n giggles. Curl was ranked as the 3rd highest safety and 21st or 22nd ranked player in FA period. He didn't forrget how to play either.
Ah, yeah, we can. You and Duke argued the entire time Riverboat was HC. You'd think after all that time and with the way things ultimately worked out. You of all people would've recognized that.
2024 NFL Free Agency Rankings: Cornerbacks
Jaylon Johnson is the top-ranked free-agent cornerback in PFF's 2024 NFL free agency rankings.www.pff.com
St elsewhere is my name for him
I don't know anything about Chinn, but I'll take G's word that he can play. I've also read a few other reviews about him. Saying he's got the talent, size n speed to capably play both safety n LB. His injury history concerns me a bit, butyou got a point. hey i wanted Curl back too. Once we signed Chinn, it wasnt looking good
I think Curl hit his ceiling. If the new regime felt that way, why pay him for what he is? Chin is a nice stop gap to likely another box safety taken in this years draft.I understand the Fuller scinero but what about Curl? He is 25.
Speak on it homey.I think you can be a fan and still be confused or question the direction of a front office, owner, or coaching staff.
There is no handbook for being a fan.
There is no commandment that says "Thou shalt trust the front office and coaches with all thy heart".
It's not treason to call out the owner, coach, or GM. It's not a totalitarian regime that you must support.
We all did it with snyder for years. To me, there is no difference in being frustrated with snyder or a coach. It should be the same. It makes no sense to allow a fan to question or be angry with snyder, but not a coach or GM.
Yes, we don't have all the information. Yes, we arent professional. However, fans drive the NFL and can have an opinion on how their team plays, how the front office executes their duties, and how the coaches prepare the players and implement their schemes. Without the fans, the NFL would not exist. Furthermore, this message board wouldn't exist either if people didn't have an opinion.
A fan certainly has the right to trust coaches completely and show loyalty to them. A fan can also repeatedly say "I am going to trust peters and harris" when there is a question asked or a discussion is taking place. Again, there is no fan handbook.
However, I believe it is shortsighted to call out a fan who forms their own opinion and doesn't automatically sign off with gusto every team transaction. Just because a fan disagrees and doesn't simply "trust" the front office on all matters doesn't mean they aren't fans or idiots.
Just my opinion and I am sure some completely disagree with it.
Breed = national treasureSpeak on it homey.
Speaking strictly for myself. I have no faith in the new FO. For what? That doesn't mean I think they'll do a bad job. Just that the days of blindly trusting a Washington Redskins front office ended about 16 years or so ago.
People say this FO is different. That's cool. Show me.