- Thread starter
- #1
redseat
Well-Known Member
Just released by Buccaneers.
Worthy of bringing into camp to see what he brings?
Worthy of bringing into camp to see what he brings?
What does he bring anything that Gunner Olszewski doesn't?
That touchdown showed promise. It helped the los was the five so when he forced the db off his spot on the goal line it was still legal...but winning on a contested play is a good start.Weird but I like our receivers, except maybe Harry. Hopefully he grows on me for good reason.
What is there to like. There is no consistency across the boardWeird but I like our receivers, except maybe Harry. Hopefully he grows on me for good reason.
We can like our wide receivers as individuals but not like the group... Which means we are a certain role away from a good group. Byrd has looked good, as has Myers... We are starting to see Gunner can make things happen in space... Harry is what he is: a wider tight end that hasn't been used effectively yet (and I'm not saying a wider tight end is what the team ever needed).What is there to like. There is no consistency across the board
We can like our wide receivers as individuals but not like the group... Which means we are a certain role away from a good group. Byrd has looked good, as has Myers... We are starting to see Gunner can make things happen in space... Harry is what he is: a wider tight end that hasn't been used effectively yet (and I'm not saying a wider tight end is what the team ever needed).
I get that we can like them as people and maybe even as individual players but to me IMO as whole they lack consistency. Yep Myers has looked good at times, Byrd at times, Gunner hasn't shown enough to make a comment IMO. But individually IMO they have been inconsistent which makes the group look inconsistent. Couple this with an inconsistent QB who at least consistently lack accuracy then again IMO I find them underwhelming.We can like our wide receivers as individuals but not like the group... Which means we are a certain role away from a good group. Byrd has looked good, as has Myers... We are starting to see Gunner can make things happen in space... Harry is what he is: a wider tight end that hasn't been used effectively yet (and I'm not saying a wider tight end is what the team ever needed).
I get that we can like them as people and maybe even as individual players but to me IMO as whole they lack consistency. Yep Myers has looked good at times, Byrd at times, Gunner hasn't shown enough to make a comment IMO. But individually IMO they have been inconsistent which makes the group look inconsistent. Couple this with an inconsistent QB who at least consistently lack accuracy then again IMO I find them underwhelming.
This team right now is run first, defend second and pray for an occasional miracle in the passing game.
I feel a QB that cannot accurately throw and WRs and TE s that struggle to get separation are a bigger part of the problem. I have hope for Myers and I too am losing patience with Harry. We all know great in college does not mean great in the NFL, and we all know BB cannot draft WRs to save his vintage VHS collection.In my opinion, if Harry lived up to his first round status we'd have a good receiving group. Byrd and Myers aren't #1's but they're good #2's and 3's. Add back in Edelman and it's a really good group. If Harry was good. He's the reason they're struggling IMO. Defenses don't need to double anybody.
AgreedGood, not great group.
No #1
Edelman is finally old
Harry can't anything
Meyers I love but he has limited impact outside of the plays he has "mastered"
Byrd has few tricks.
Our receivers likely have more plays that they can do but Cam cannot!!!!!
Harry's only chance to succeed is to play tougher.
Not try to get open but run right through the defender!
Hall-of-Famer Says He Could Turn Around Patriots' Potential Bust WR
When a first-round pick is struggling and several players picked after you are performing better, they will be a topic of conversation.heavy.com