- Thread starter
- #1
leomaz
Well-Known Member
What is the consensus of how Lovie and Josh have the Bucs playing? Or does Lovie and Josh get a pass?
Jerry Angelo was a bad GM, just bad, like real bad, bad bad bad.... bad.
Dead on. Lovie was a top coach. He did more with less.Jerry Angelo was a bad GM, just bad, like real bad, bad bad bad.... bad.
And yet he still built a roster which would have made the playoffs every year from 2005-2010 if we had a decent coaching staff. The three years in there where we had a competent DC (and still had a weak offensive staff), we went 35-13. If Lovie hadn't gotten rid of Babich, we could easily have duplicated that for the middle three years. And yes, our rosters in 2011 and 2012 would have been playoff-worthy if not for injuries.
I just don't understand the Angelo hate. Yes, he couldn't draft an OL to save his life. Actually, the whole offense outside of running back was weak for him. He still gave us a good enough defense and special teams to make us compete. And before Lovie's ego got big enough to force Rivera out (and yes, I know some posters here think the problem was Rivera's ego looking for a gig....I disagree), we did just that. When Lovie and his minion Babich gave reigns to Marinelli, we did it again. We know the problem wasn't the roster because when the coaches were good, the team did well.
I feel the same way about Lovie that I did about Bret Bielema. He is a good leader in terms of team culture. His players respect him, and he got free agents to come because of it. He did get guys to work hard and buy into what his staff was selling. The problem is that he just isn't a spectacular coach in the other respects. He has to have good assistants to win. And unlike Bielema, when he had a spectacular assistant, he forced him out.
That's unforgivable to me. I would have had his back if he kept Rivera around until he inevitably got a Head Coaching job. But to let ego cause him to leave (and to see Rivera's San Diego defense finish #1, while the Bears toiled in mediocrity) was frustrating. I'd rather have Trestman, who may not be the leader in terms of team culture, but is a great offensive mind.
And yet he still built a roster which would have made the playoffs every year from 2005-2010 if we had a decent coaching staff. The three years in there where we had a competent DC (and still had a weak offensive staff), we went 35-13. If Lovie hadn't gotten rid of Babich, we could easily have duplicated that for the middle three years. And yes, our rosters in 2011 and 2012 would have been playoff-worthy if not for injuries.
I just don't understand the Angelo hate. Yes, he couldn't draft an OL to save his life. Actually, the whole offense outside of running back was weak for him. He still gave us a good enough defense and special teams to make us compete. And before Lovie's ego got big enough to force Rivera out (and yes, I know some posters here think the problem was Rivera's ego looking for a gig....I disagree), we did just that. When Lovie and his minion Babich gave reigns to Marinelli, we did it again. We know the problem wasn't the roster because when the coaches were good, the team did well.
I feel the same way about Lovie that I did about Bret Bielema. He is a good leader in terms of team culture. His players respect him, and he got free agents to come because of it. He did get guys to work hard and buy into what his staff was selling. The problem is that he just isn't a spectacular coach in the other respects. He has to have good assistants to win. And unlike Bielema, when he had a spectacular assistant, he forced him out.
That's unforgivable to me. I would have had his back if he kept Rivera around until he inevitably got a Head Coaching job. But to let ego cause him to leave (and to see Rivera's San Diego defense finish #1, while the Bears toiled in mediocrity) was frustrating. I'd rather have Trestman, who may not be the leader in terms of team culture, but is a great offensive mind.
I disagree that he needs a year or two. With the Bears, yeah... he was a journeyman who hadn't proven much before he came here. But in his first year with Marc Trestman, he played like a quality starter. He's an experienced backup who has recently demonstrated quality play last year before signing with the Bucs. His pedestrian performance is more about his coaching, offense and supporting cast than it is about him.McCown is the guy that should not make mistakes and allow the defense to win games. Its gonna take a year or two to get the players behind him.
I disagree that he needs a year or two. With the Bears, yeah... he was a journeyman who hadn't proven much before he came here. But in his first year with Marc Trestman, he played like a quality starter. He's an experienced backup who has recently demonstrated quality play last year before signing with the Bucs. His pedestrian performance is more about his coaching, offense and supporting cast than it is about him.
I still think the bears had a chance in the superbowl if Lovie didnt take the defensive play calls away from Rivera. He will always need an assistant head coach who is the offensive coordinator.
McCown is the guy that should not make mistakes and allow the defense to win games. Its gonna take a year or two to get the players behind him.
Lol… what?
Josh McCown very well may not start another game for Tampa Bay. He's a god damned downright bad QB.
I said he wouldn't make it to game 10. Looks like the benching came earlier than expected.