- Thread starter
- #1
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
Looks like JHC, SDH, Holcomb. I would think they would have to move Ryan Anderson to ILB now.
Looks like JHC, SDH, Holcomb. I would think they would have to move Ryan Anderson to ILB now.
I forgot about Foster.
Didn't the Redskins let their 1918 ILB escape in free agency?
Just goes to show you how thin we are at multiple positions and this is one of them. We all know Mason is not starter material and while many have applauded the play of SDH, he clearly lacks speed, range and the athletic prowess of say Ruben Foster. Moving Anderson there only makes us slower so no go. Have to go find a replacement possibly after June 1st.Looks like JHC, SDH, Holcomb. I would think they would have to move Ryan Anderson to ILB now.
Sounds like a fit.Injury to Reuben Foster could help Chiefs, Redskins strike a deal
Not sure if there is anything to this or this is pure BS.
Injury to Reuben Foster could help Chiefs, Redskins strike a deal
Not sure if there is anything to this or this is pure BS.
Looks like an opinion piece. I wouldn't be against getting rid of Norman's contract.
I'm the guy advocating for ridding ourselves of Norman, he stinks and he is over paid. My logic is because we are not going to sniff a SB this year so why pay Norman? As for Stroman, he was hyped more by a former DB coach because he came from VT. Stroman was torched often last year in spot play but I will say this, his EFFORT is always there and I cannot say the same for Norman. I'm not a Norman hater however, his play and his mouth do not fit with this young and upcoming team. I would rather give up a few TD's this year and improve our younger players with live reps than keep Norman. Those young guys you listed above, will create enough competition to compete just fine in Norman's spot.well you could upgrade at ILB while taking a hit at CB . with safety also in flux you would have to weigh the lesser of 2 evils . this would be really simple if we had fuller but the ASS trade screwed that up
the guy who advocates getting rid of norman is the same guy who has issues with stroman . and dunny is an unknown quantity at this point . is johnson ready for a bigger role ? alexander ? moreland ?
a trade for a late round pick my do the trick
My logic is if we make the playoffs anything can happen . I certainly am not entertaining let’s give up on the season before a damn meaningful snap us taken . And if those youngsters earn the playing time over JN then I am fine with it . That is how it should beI'm the guy advocating for ridding ourselves of Norman, he stinks and he is over paid. My logic is because we are not going to sniff a SB this year so why pay Norman? As for Stroman, he was hyped more by a former DB coach because he came from VT. Stroman was torched often last year in spot play but I will say this, his EFFORT is always there and I cannot say the same for Norman. I'm not a Norman hater however, his play and his mouth do not fit with this young and upcoming team. I would rather give up a few TD's this year and improve our younger players with live reps than keep Norman. Those young guys you listed above, will create enough competition to compete just fine in Norman's spot.
me either dad. I was just studying some anatomy images because I did not know there was an artery that far down.![]()
Not really "escape" - they released him. That would be Zach Brown. He signed a dirt cheap one year deal with the Eagles. He underperformed last season after a good season in 2017 - partially due to injuries - & also was a malcontent. I don't regret the Skins decision on this one in the least - even with the Foster injury.