flamingrey
Active Member
- 5,536
- 0
- 36
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2011
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
You could argue that had McFadden been healthy, Palmer would have suffered more. He's not a "game manager" like Campbell was, and having more of a running game would have taken more of the deep throws away from Palmer, and more than likely, put more emphasis on the shorter routes, which is where Palmer gets quite a few of his picks...and pick-6's as results.
Yes, the running game would open up the deep pass. I realize that, but if you are able to run the ball, and eat up the clock like Oakland was doing early in the year, there's no need to attempt higher risk passes down-field...or at least, throw as many as Palmer was doing because, outside of 2 games, Bush wasn't getting as much as McFadden was, at least seemingly.
Palmer is what he is. A system QB. If everything around him is perfect (see 2005) he'll thrive. When he's forced to adjust on the fly and adapt, he struggles. That's always been his knock, and why he's not a good game manager or check down QB. He'll have his yards, because of his arm and ability to get the ball down field in an open offense. But in a run-oriented offense, he's going to struggle, and in an offense where he has to make multiple check-downs and adapt away from the play called, he's going to do even worse.
The stats tell a different story. In the games Bush had monster games in the run game, Carson played very well. When Bush had good games, Carson also played well. It was in the games where Bush struggled because teams honed in on the run game with Oakland's top receivers missing that Carson didn't play well. That inside attack opens up the entire field, and while Carson isn't overly accurate on the short passes, it opens up those intermediate to long passes where Carson flourishes.
Also, when the run game was going, Carson was throwing a lot fewer passes. And he was successful. I think he only passed the ball 20 times in that San Diego game. In the Detroit game in the first half, he wasn't passing the ball much because the run game again was going and he played very well.
The year Carson had Chris Perry healthy, he was great at getting him the ball in space. Bush is also a good receiver out of the backfield and he was one of Carson's favorite targets. Outside of those 2 years, the Bengals nor Carson have ever had a consistent threat out of the backfield. Think back to 2009 when Leonard saw the field, he made huge plays on 3rd down for us because Carson found him on checkdowns (and some designed plays). We saw the same thing this year with Dalton. It was only when Leonard saw the field that Dalton would hit his checkdowns. Rudi, Benson, and Scott (he could be, but they don't allow it) are not those kind of players. That's a system thing.
You give Carson a decent o-line, a good running game, and receivers that know how to run their routes, he'll thrive.
Last edited by a moderator: