- Thread starter
- #1
MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
Again, we are only talking 5X5, and all the other categories are traditional
This category argument, I never thought of making until a couple weeks ago in another debate... I realized that XBH is a better category for fantasy than HR is... Now, I understand HRs is probably everyone's favorite category, and because of that even if you agree that XBH is better than HR, you still would not change it(that's where I am)... But for right now, lets just debate which category is the better one for fantasy...
First let me explain the way I see categories in fantasy, I see them all to be stand alone stats, and there should not be multiple stats that give a certain type of player to big of an advantage... The problem we have now is that power batters are given 2 categories that are a clear advantage for them... that is RBIs and HRs... The typical speed guy can not help you at all in 2 categories, while the typical power hitter can not help you at all in only one... that is not balanced enough... It should not be what type of player is better it should be what player is better!!! and that is what XBH does... Yes, power bats still have the advantage in XBH, but now at least the average speed guy can contribute in this category... Now the speed guy can contribute in all 5 categories, even if they have a disadvantage in 3 of them(XBH,RBIs, Runs)... Yes I included runs as well, power scores more per AB than speed or any other type of player...
And No, Slugging % or XBH%, or OPS, are not good replacements for HR...
Yes, there are better solutions to this, but the whole point of categories is to keep the categories simple... and the most simple way I can see to take away the Immense advantage of the power hitter is by changing HR to XBH...
again, I believe the purpose of categories is to measure specific aspects of baseball without giving any type of player an advantage... Players themselves should be the advantage not the style of play they do...
This category argument, I never thought of making until a couple weeks ago in another debate... I realized that XBH is a better category for fantasy than HR is... Now, I understand HRs is probably everyone's favorite category, and because of that even if you agree that XBH is better than HR, you still would not change it(that's where I am)... But for right now, lets just debate which category is the better one for fantasy...
First let me explain the way I see categories in fantasy, I see them all to be stand alone stats, and there should not be multiple stats that give a certain type of player to big of an advantage... The problem we have now is that power batters are given 2 categories that are a clear advantage for them... that is RBIs and HRs... The typical speed guy can not help you at all in 2 categories, while the typical power hitter can not help you at all in only one... that is not balanced enough... It should not be what type of player is better it should be what player is better!!! and that is what XBH does... Yes, power bats still have the advantage in XBH, but now at least the average speed guy can contribute in this category... Now the speed guy can contribute in all 5 categories, even if they have a disadvantage in 3 of them(XBH,RBIs, Runs)... Yes I included runs as well, power scores more per AB than speed or any other type of player...
And No, Slugging % or XBH%, or OPS, are not good replacements for HR...
Yes, there are better solutions to this, but the whole point of categories is to keep the categories simple... and the most simple way I can see to take away the Immense advantage of the power hitter is by changing HR to XBH...
again, I believe the purpose of categories is to measure specific aspects of baseball without giving any type of player an advantage... Players themselves should be the advantage not the style of play they do...