How Weird Would A

[cdumler7]

Broncos defense just held the #4 offense to practically nothing while the offense put up 38 in an off game where they had 4 turnovers. Chiefs barely beat a Cleveland team with a 3rd string quarterback in. Much respect to the chiefs and being 8-0 but they have definitely looked just as beatable as any of the top teams

 

[MrMoJoRisin63]

Not true...the Bronco's simply dont have to use their RB for the majority of their receiving yards since they have actual receivers.....you remember those dont you ?? those players that NE USED to have ??? back before you had the 21st rated offense in the league .

It actuallu is true, Charles is a more versatile back. I won't banter back and forth over this you are wrong I am okay with you being wrong about this.

Have a nice day.

 

[eric5577x]

I thought Den already won the SB?

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

It actuallu is true, Charles is a more versatile back. I won't banter back and forth over this you are wrong I am okay with you being wrong about this.

Have a nice day.

It's funny how you run out of words when you no longer have any facts to support your bias. But I do like how you have obviously given up on the possibility of NE achieving anything meaningful this season though. Legitimately insightful on your behalf.

 

[MrMoJoRisin63]

It's funny how you run out of words when you no longer have any facts to support your bias. But I do like how you have obviously given up on the possibility of NE achieving anything meaningful this season though. Legitimately insightful on your behalf.

I presented the facts you chose to ignore them. Charles does have one more fumble and one less TD but almost 200 yards more running and 12 more receptions you mean those facts? LOL


And yeah, I pretty much figured the Pats weren't going to the SB this year, I have no issue at all with that. IMO The Donks and the Chiefs are better teams at this point in time, I am okay with that. Was that suppose to be a hurtful comment?

 

[MrMoJoRisin63]

I thought Den already won the SB?

I think early on they were the team to beat, but the Cotls exploited them and in all honesty the Skins gave them a run for their money, they had a melt down, point is I think the Donks are quite beatable as are the Chiefs. But at this point IMO the Chiefs and Seahawks appear to be SB favorites. Now we all know that means nothing come playoff time. Just seems like some Donk fans get their diapers all in a knot when you mention that.

 

[BOTSLAYER]

in to say weird, old school vs new school from jerseys to coaching staff, play style and fans.

 

[MrMoJoRisin63]

in to say weird, old school vs new school from jerseys to coaching staff, play style and fans.

That too hadn't thought about it on that level, but that is very true.

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

I presented the facts you chose to ignore them. Charles does have one more fumble and one less TD but almost 200 yards more running and 12 more receptions you mean those facts? LOL


And yeah, I pretty much figured the Pats weren't going to the SB this year, I have no issue at all with that. IMO The Donks and the Chiefs are better teams at this point in time, I am okay with that. Was that suppose to be a hurtful comment?

Charles has 2 more fumbles and 2 less rushing TD's on the "SAME ypc" that Moreno has. Charles has 200 total yards more rushing because he is 95% of their offense..and like I said, more importantly, Denver has actual receivers to do most of the receiving work...They dont need a RB to be their top receiver.

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

I think early on they were the team to beat, but the Cotls exploited them and in all honesty the Skins gave them a run for their money, they had a melt down, point is I think the Donks are quite beatable as are the Chiefs. But at this point IMO the Chiefs and Seahawks appear to be SB favorites. Now we all know that means nothing come playoff time. Just seems like some Donk fans get their diapers all in a knot when you mention that.

sister, you can make any wild ass pick you want for who you think will play in a Superbowl..any objections are based simply on your misinformation as to why.

 

[Broncos6482]

Neither team has played a juggernaut schedule. Bottom line is all teams are 0-0 when the playoffs start. We will see, I will be pulling for KC only because they have been down for so long it will be nice to see a new team make a playoff run.

You're changing the topic, we were talking about which team looked more beatable. A 6 point win over a bad team playing it's 3rd string quarterback doesn't inspire a lot of confidence. Neither does a 1 point win over another bad team also playing their third string quarterback.

 

[Broncos6482]

I think early on they were the team to beat, but the Cotls exploited them and in all honesty the Skins gave them a run for their money, they had a melt down, point is I think the Donks are quite beatable as are the Chiefs. But at this point IMO the Chiefs and Seahawks appear to be SB favorites. Now we all know that means nothing come playoff time. Just seems like some Donk fans get their diapers all in a knot when you mention that.

Yes, the Colts exploited us. The blueprint for beating the Broncos is this; have a great front 4 that is capable of getting pressure by itself without a lot of blitzing, a secondary that is big enough to play tight press coverage while also fast enough to stay with the speed guys, and the front 7 has to be good enough to stop the run while the safeties play deep, and have an offense that can sustain drives and put up 35+ points. And while your at it, throw in some pretty significant injuries on the Broncos offensive line, just to give you that added boost to stopping the run and rushing the passer.

Do all that and you can definitely beat the Broncos. So that means there are, what, 3 teams capable of beating them via that blueprint?

 

[JDM]

The broncos have actually been beat. Surely that is "more beatable"?

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

The broncos have actually been beat. Surely that is "more beatable"?

I reckon that depends on who is giving the attempted beating....at any rate, at least that is a more arguable argument.

 

[Broncos6482]

The broncos have actually been beat. Surely that is "more beatable"?

Not really because they haven't played the same schedule. Unless you think that the Chiefs would still be undefeated if they played Denver's schedule, or Denver would not be if they played the Chiefs schedule.

 

[JDM]

I think the broncos are a better team than KC, but they split head to head and make a good run for the division.

Calling Moreno comparable in any way whatsoever to Charles is laughable though.

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

Not really because they haven't played the same schedule. Unless you think that the Chiefs would still be undefeated if they played Denver's schedule, or Denver would not be if they played the Chiefs schedule.

I think that if the schedules were reversed, the chiefs would be 6-2 today

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

I think the broncos are a better team than KC, but they split head to head and make a good run for the division.

Calling Moreno comparable in any way whatsoever to Charles is laughable though.

The stats dont lie...Moreno actually has better RB numbers overall than Charles does at the moment...I dont care how much you would love to believe Charles is some world beater...Moreno has more 20+ runs, less fumbles, and more TD's, and the same ypc...call it whatever you want

 

[MrMoJoRisin63]

So are you implying Denver has had a tougher schedule? Not sure about that.

 

[KwitYerWhinin]

So are you implying Denver has had a tougher schedule? Not sure about that.

I think KC would have lost to the ravens...and would/will lose to Indy