Gator
Well-Known Member
They over rank the SEC teams, so then every SEC team claims they have a hard sched because they play each other, so then they stay higher ranked becuase they supposedly play a harder sched... you could LITERALLY do it with any conference.
stupid. stupid. stupid.
I do not believe you are correct!
All of the bitching basically began when UF moved over Michigan to play OSU in 2006. In the span from 2006 to 2013 you are asserting that the SEC teams were over ranked, which caused an inflated SOS, and thus "remained" higher ranked (presumably when they lost). Do I have it right?
By that logic, in OOC games against the other major conferences, the OTHER conferences should have the advantage of playing a ranked SEC team (an OVER ranked SEC team) while the SEC should end up playing an UNranked (and UNDER ranked) non SEC team. Thus, the other conferences should play MORE ranked teams (their totals inflated by the numbers of over-ranked SEC opponents) and they should have easy victories over those inflated SEC teams.
That's where your logic falls apart. In the years 2006-2013, it is the SEC teams that have played MORE ranked teams OOC majors than any other conference!
# of OOC AP ranked MAJOR opponents
SEC 85
ACC 79
Big Ten 70
PAC-12 59
Big 12 49
Not only have they played MORE ranked major opponents than the other conferences but a higher percentage of their games against major opponents have been against ranked teams.
SEC 85/182--46.70%
PAC-12 59/141--41.84%
Big Ten 70/169--41.42%
ACC 79/217--36.41%
Big 12 49/143--34.27%
So if the SEC has sooo many over ranked teams how come the other conferences don't have hundreds of games against over ranked SEC teams?
Whether you like it or not HERE is the reason the SEC is so highly regarded.
In OOC games vs top 10 ranked majors
SEC 13-18--41.94%
PAC-12 5-20--20.00%
Big 12 4-21--16.00%
ACC 1-37--2.63%
Big Ten 0-28--0.00%
In OOC games vs ranked majors
SEC 41-44--48.24%
PAC-12 19-40--32.20%
Big 12 13-36--26.53%
Big Ten 17-53--24.29%
ACC 11-68--13.92%
Your view of why the SEC is highly ranked is fuzzy. You need to look at it this way: the fact that the SEC does SO well against the OTHER MAJORS (their winning %age against top 10 teams is more than 2x any other conference!) is viewed as a sign of strength. Thus, when SEC teams lose to each other it is viewed as two strong teams played and SOMEONE had to win and therefore the loser doesn't fall far. In other conferences which haven't done very well OOC, (say the Big Ten which is 0-28 against top 10 major teams OOC) losses to other conference teams is viewed as just another sign of weakness.