ChrisperJ10
Above Average Member
Ugh, Yes you do. You even the shit outta sports bro...No, I dont even sports.
Ugh, Yes you do. You even the shit outta sports bro...No, I dont even sports.
I will give them credit for Bosh but not Wade. I f you've been watching the Heat all playoffs long, Wade been playing like this all playoffs long due to his knee.
Ugh, Yes you do. You even the shit outta sports bro...
You take offense to me saying that James has been great?
Put it this way. Wade is crippled. Bosh has been dominated. Allen/Battier have been awful. Now, Hibbard has been dominant. The Pacers for the most part have dictated the style of play. YET, the Heat lead the series 3-2 and have been in a position to win the games they lost.
Of course the Heats defense has been a factor. It always is. However, the Pacers defense has also been very good.
So, what is the biggest difference between the teams? Answer is obviously we have James, they don't. If you put James on the Pacers roster and give us George in exchange, the series would already be over. We wouldn't stand a chance.
Now, as far as the Spurs. I totally respect them and if they had HC like Ok City did last year, I would be picking them to win. I think both teams can win on each others court, but I'm not convinced they can beat us here twice, and especially if it goes to game 7.
As far as East/West, I was talking top 2-3 teams. Who cares if the Hawks could beat the Warriors , etc..l
Maybe he did, but when you say "we were beat by these same Pacers" it makes you kind of wonder how many cobwebs are upstairs.
Gotta hand it to Bosh!! Watching him being interviewed and he's making no excuses for his poor play!! I respect that!!
No, however you said the Heat success is attributed to nothing but the greatness of James. It's just not accurate. This is just more of the same ole BS we all heard when LBJ was in Cleveland. No one player can be attributed to reaching the finals it always takes a team effort, otherwise MJ wouldn't of had such trouble early on in his career. Now we have a game 7 and anything can happen in a game 7, so if they end up losing can we blame it all on James?
It's just the way it works, if you want to give LBJ all the props for success than he should get all the critique if they falter. BTW I don't agree with that notion either. It's a team win and it's a team the loss. Certain players can step up and 'help' their team win or they can falter and 'challenge' their team in a loss.
One thing I don't get is how LBJ gets called for a T for running down the court if he never said a word to the refs? Is there a rule stating that if you run down the court w/out saying a word to the ref that you're giving a T