SoCalWizFan
Well-Known Member
Every front office does, or atleast SHOULD take fan reaction into consideration to some degree. After all, its we the fans that ultimately help keep the team afloat. Now Im not saying you base moves off of a fan vote or anything silly like that. But the difference between a half empty stadium in week 14, and a full house is sometimes based off of fan sentiment towards the players. Especially if the team has had a rough year.
I also think at the end of it, our GM doesnt need to get US excited so much as the FAN who actually writes his check. I think in the end, if we move on from Kirk and make a play for one of the QBs in the draft, Dan will have more to do with it than any of us.
That just isn't as true in this era as it may have been years ago. TV revenue drives everything & even teams w/ empty stadiums will make a fortune. In the end empty stands in week 14 are the product of a losing team - not the absence of sexy, star players. Having guys like Johnny Football or RG3 on your team don't mean squat if they are not winning.
I maintain that teams should almost completely ignore fan reaction & just do the rt thing. Heck - remember those screaming Eagles fans years ago booing the selection of McNaab since they wanted Ricky Williams. I am sure that most of them were thrilled that the FO ignored those clowns (to get the Eagles version of McNaab - not the horrible, aging one on the Redskins).
I also believe that you are overplaying the Snyder effect. I have seen nothing in the past few years to indicate that he is meddling & I am pretty sure that SM would walk if this started to rear its ugly head again. The recent results for this organization certainly could be somewhat better. However - one good thing is that I really don't see any signs of the dysfunctional organization that was at play in the relatively recent past.