- Thread starter
- #1
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
They totally shut out the Vikes in the 2nd half. P. Smith a huge day. Gruden has me confused again. Does he even trust KC?
look werent you bitching about that the other way around after the first 2 games ?
Absolutely we should have run it on second down.
I think dean has a valid, if not 100% correct point far as a trust issue goes. Yeah, the Skins won the game and that's all good. But today's game did nothing to ease concerns about the Skins play in the RZ. Before today, the Skins were 13/32 in the RZ and are now 14/36. I don't know where its at, but somewhere in that statement there's something that says, that's not a top dollar QB money stat.
Maybe they weren't testing Kirk. Maybe they were testing the defense. Either way, I don't think the answer to signing Kirk long term became any clearer today than it was yesterday.
I think we need to sign KC long term. I just want Gruden to let KC win the game. I think the Dallas game really got to him.
Got to who? Kirk or Gruden? Regardless, something tells me KC's gonna get a few opportunities before the season ends to win some games with his arm. IMO we're gonna be in dog-fights every week. And in one or two of em, the Skins are gonna be the team that's got the ball last and needs a TD to win.
dean we won the game , we shoulkd have run the ball and we did periodlol. skinsdad you do realize that our defense is responsible for 4 out of our 5 wins this year. It worked b/c the defense shut them down. We are going to make KC one of the highest paid QB's in the NFL, don't you think we should allow him to WIN the game in that situation?