NWPATSFAN
Well-Known Member
Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.Gronk has played a full season just once in his career.
Sam Bradford is more durable.
Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.Gronk has played a full season just once in his career.
Sam Bradford is more durable.
Stop with so much inaccurate fake news. It would make staying on topic easier. Wasn't it your girl Black Francis who introduced SoS. He wasn't accurate as usual, but we've come to expect that from the two of you.
I'd take him but not at the cost and would pick other TEs first.Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.
SheHawk barrage in 3, 2, 1The 49ers defense proved today in Seattle what that GB defense was all about last week
The Seattle offense is a serious problem
Bottom line I was spot on. Lots of talent and nothing to show for it.
Jets are historically awful this year
New Orleans defense is on a historically awful run for a long time now
Indy will win a few games with Brissett
New England will be fine
I agree 100%Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.
Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.
Not sure about NE, missing some pass rushers like when we had Jones or healthy Nink, hopefully Hightower comes back soon, and the secondary looks awful so far. Hope your right and hurts having Julian out all year, more important than the Thread namesake imo
Each and every idiot on here would take Gronk on their team whether it be for half a season or a full season. Don't deny.
Please tell me you're REALLY, REALLY, REALLY drunk and not this stupid. What does post 564 infer?i said nothing about strength of schedule
i said gronk was a bitch
false
i like players who play at least 16 games in a season
Sure, cool storyI'd take him but not at the cost and would pick other TEs first.
Please tell me you're REALLY, REALLY, REALLY drunk and not this stupid. What does post 564 infer?
Then @sonnyblack65 slapped you around again with actual facts.
Not being a brittle bitch is important criteria that would excuse Gronk.Sure, cool story
I see you read like you argue points. Not very well. Have it your way. Philly has always and will continue to suck and I'm not just talking about the FeablesNegative.
I already corrected you once.
They went to conf title games with wide receivers who would be cut from most rosters.
Had they paid Owens, they probably win a title.
Back on topic though, gronk = brittle bitch
Not being a brittle bitch is important criteria that would excuse Gronk.
Can't say I'd blame you. But brittle Jimmy was injured again today. Any status on that?I'd take an o-line first.
Yanda going down for the season and Chuck and Duck Joe at QB no need to worry about the rat birds.I think they could legitimately run into some problems in the postseason IF and a big IF they have to go on the road this January....Its early and other teams will get hit with big injuries, but KC/Denver and Pitt look like really well rounded teams right now...Im not really buying the Ravens start........But I wouldnt imagine for a second the Pats dont play in January
Not a fan of Carr?false
i like players who play at least 16 games in a season