- Thread starter
- #21
jstewismybastardson
Lord Shitlord aka El cibernauta
This is why the Goldwater Inst. lawsuit is so misguided. They claim to be protecting the taxpayer, but the investment into the arena has already been made. It makes zero economic sense to remove the anchor tenant from the arena for the local taxpayer.
I am still holding the situation that it is a moot point, since there are rumors that a) there is a buyer of the bonds, and b) the lawsuit will fail on the precedent of public support for other professional sports in the area (Suns, Cards, and Diamondbacks all receive or received public funding). But still.
one rumour says it is the NHL