- Thread starter
- #1
SFGRTB
Superstitious Fan
Per Buster Onley: Olney: Leon gives Boston a new Tek solution behind the plate
I don't have insider but saw a synopsis on Twitter. Basically The Giants want to replace Bobby Evans and have Sabean go back to his old role, the one he took in 2015, with less day-to-day activity and more scouting.
This isn't really surprising, I guess, that Evans would be the scapegoat here, even though I can't really fault him that much. I feel like many of the moves he made were sound at the time, but just about every one backfired.
The worst move was Matt Moore, undoubtedly, but so far that hasn't really reached A.J. Pierzynski levels of bad. The Longo trade could be pretty bad. Mike Leake, Cueto, Shark were all pretty solid deals at the time that I don't necessarily blame him for. Melancon was debatable (I didn't like it, but conceded that it had to happen at the time). Belt and Crawford extensions were automatic.
He did great in the Nunez trade and the Will Smith trade.
Frankly if I absolutely had to take one move back from him, it would be the Longoria trade. Yes Matt Moore was really bad but it's not going to hangstring us for the next 4 years like Longo will. The rest were deals that had to happen and unfortunately didn't work out, and in fact probably ended up as the worst-case scenarios.
Also, it's unfair to pin it on one guy. Bobby Evans wasn't going rogue here or anything.
Oh well, maybe this gives them a chance to bring in a fresh mind and hopefully a major forward thinker. My worry is that they bring in someone like that, but operate under the status-quo, and therefore waste this person's talent.
If they bring someone on, I want to see them get a lot of power and say over everything, not just a mouthpiece for Sabean and his archaic processes. Bring in someone like Farhan Zaidi from the Dodgers and have him hire someone else to be the GM. Kind of like the Cubs power structure where they have Theo as the president and Jed Hoyer as the GM. Although in this scenario Sabean is probably the president.
I don't have insider but saw a synopsis on Twitter. Basically The Giants want to replace Bobby Evans and have Sabean go back to his old role, the one he took in 2015, with less day-to-day activity and more scouting.
This isn't really surprising, I guess, that Evans would be the scapegoat here, even though I can't really fault him that much. I feel like many of the moves he made were sound at the time, but just about every one backfired.
The worst move was Matt Moore, undoubtedly, but so far that hasn't really reached A.J. Pierzynski levels of bad. The Longo trade could be pretty bad. Mike Leake, Cueto, Shark were all pretty solid deals at the time that I don't necessarily blame him for. Melancon was debatable (I didn't like it, but conceded that it had to happen at the time). Belt and Crawford extensions were automatic.
He did great in the Nunez trade and the Will Smith trade.
Frankly if I absolutely had to take one move back from him, it would be the Longoria trade. Yes Matt Moore was really bad but it's not going to hangstring us for the next 4 years like Longo will. The rest were deals that had to happen and unfortunately didn't work out, and in fact probably ended up as the worst-case scenarios.
Also, it's unfair to pin it on one guy. Bobby Evans wasn't going rogue here or anything.
Oh well, maybe this gives them a chance to bring in a fresh mind and hopefully a major forward thinker. My worry is that they bring in someone like that, but operate under the status-quo, and therefore waste this person's talent.
If they bring someone on, I want to see them get a lot of power and say over everything, not just a mouthpiece for Sabean and his archaic processes. Bring in someone like Farhan Zaidi from the Dodgers and have him hire someone else to be the GM. Kind of like the Cubs power structure where they have Theo as the president and Jed Hoyer as the GM. Although in this scenario Sabean is probably the president.