Category 5o
Errday Trollin'
Grats Wingels!
:ballchain:
Agree or disagree, but after watching this game, its clearly evident that the Sharks need more team speed. The Blackhawks had everything working for them, and it seemed like the Sharks were always a foot behind. I don't think the Sharks can compete against the Hawks if games are played like this last one. Plus the Blackhawks were withoutv Sharp too. The chances were there for the Sharks to score, but when you are chasing most of the time, its not going to be pretty. I know you cant always bring your A Game, but Chicago's stars rose up during the whole game, and the Sharks stars came up in spurts.
But I do believe that Doug will have to make a tough choice, during the trade deadline to make the right moves. I don't make much faith in Havlat making the team more dangerous when he returns.
I just HATE when we lose to the HAWKS!
Typical Sharks game against Chicago. I don't know why they always play like shit against this team. Chicago is not that much better than the Sharks. But you see the way Chicago plays against San Jose and it makes you wonder how the hell do they ever lose a game.
ahhhhhhhaahahahahhahahhahahaha I dont know if im laughing so hard cause of the "chicago is not much better tha the sharks" comment or cause im plowed.... eaither way im my head im thinking, I won $50 betting a hawks fan for the hawks to WIN... He was blinded by the 6-0-1 recent record of SJ... I love my team but man, to say " chicago is not much better thean the sharkrs" are you kidding me?? on paper vs is on ice is one thing, but you really think even on paper chi is "not that much" better then SJ?? As much as it pains me to say, the ONLY dept SJ is better then Chi is in goaltending and thats cause crawford is in the sophmore slump... down the road I think he's better then Niemi...
ahhhhhhhaahahahahhahahhahahaha I dont know if im laughing so hard cause of the "chicago is not much better tha the sharks" comment or cause im plowed.... eaither way im my head im thinking, I won $50 betting a hawks fan for the hawks to WIN... He was blinded by the 6-0-1 recent record of SJ... I love my team but man, to say " chicago is not much better thean the sharkrs" are you kidding me?? on paper vs is on ice is one thing, but you really think even on paper chi is "not that much" better then SJ?? As much as it pains me to say, the ONLY dept SJ is better then Chi is in goaltending and thats cause crawford is in the sophmore slump... down the road I think he's better then Niemi...
If Chicago was so great they'd be way ahead in the standings. The Sharks have a better points per game percentage than Chicago. The Sharks also have a better goal differential that the Blackhawks in fewer games. If the Sharks win 3 of their 4 games in hand (or any combination of wins and loser points that equals 6 or more points) they are ahead of Chicago in the standings. The Blackhawks are good but they aren't some great juggernaut.
If Chicago was so great they'd be way ahead in the standings. The Sharks have a better points per game percentage than Chicago. The Sharks also have a better goal differential that the Blackhawks in fewer games. If the Sharks win 3 of their 4 games in hand (or any combination of wins and loser points that equals 6 or more points) they are ahead of Chicago in the standings. The Blackhawks are good but they aren't some great juggernaut.
If Chicago was so great they'd be way ahead in the standings. The Sharks have a better points per game percentage than Chicago. The Sharks also have a better goal differential that the Blackhawks in fewer games. If the Sharks win 3 of their 4 games in hand (or any combination of wins and loser points that equals 6 or more points) they are ahead of Chicago in the standings. The Blackhawks are good but they aren't some great juggernaut.
Hmm... Sounds to me like someone is confused about which is their favorite team and is hanging out on the wrong forum here?
Hmm... Sounds to me like someone is confused about which is their favorite team and is hanging out on the wrong forum here?