- Thread starter
- #21
PuckinUgly57
Don't be a jabroni.
I just dont buy Clarke as a Dman
There isn't anything great about him at all, it's those cute little passes and spinorama stuff that keeps him relevant.
I just dont buy Clarke as a Dman
Kraken only had one shot on goal in the third.
Still looked better than the kings
I was at the game, first time getting to see a few of the Kings in person including Q. Watching him live, he really jumps off the page with his skills. He is big and fast. I'm not sure why he hasn't been able to put it all together yet, but I am still optimistic. He is 22 and some players don't figure it out until they're 25+. I understand the frustration, but I wouldn't give up on him yet.
Kraken wanted it more and I thought a couple of the goals were a little soft by Kuemper.
I understand and agree f4k. You dont draft t5 or even 10 hoping you can develope that guy in 5 to 7 seasons....thats what later rounds are for, otherwise why does it matter when you pick. You should get that game changer, point getter shut down D etc....if your developing it, you've missed out
Kakko is a great example, also a 2OA and sucked balls in NY but look at what he's done in Seattle since the trade and watching the game, he really looked different than all the times I saw him in NY.
Kakko has been the Kraken's best player since he arrived and he has also rejuvenated Beniers who has really struggled since his Calder winning year. Expectations are high in Seattle for Beniers, he is a complete player really strong on the defensive end and that has been fairly consistent, he does have excellent offensive vision and a decent shot but the stats haven't been there yet, but has really put up some good numbers playing with Kakko.