IPostedWhat
I'm So High Right Now
I'm sick of the whole you can't see the puck so it's no goal debate. In this case the puck was clearly caught up in the lower part of his body and that was in the net. It's a good goal.
Once again, they waved it off at the time it happened, and in order to overrule that call, they need to clearly see it cross the line.
In a case like this you simply can't just say, "Well it looks like it would have crossed the line if we could actually see it."
That's why I would like to know if they were privy to a camera angle that the TV wasn't showing?