Flames-Nucks GNT

[sTyLnK]

That was such a goal.

 

[IPostedWhat]

They need some type of sensor in the puck.

 

[dash]

Love how Weekes was like Luongo changed Jokinen's angle. He didn't do a damn thing. haha. Good stuff.

Lee and Weekes are terrible!!

 

[dash]

They need some type of sensor in the puck.

Oh no, not this shit again

 

[IPostedWhat]

No goal.

 

[naslundfan19]

I can't even see the puck. Then again, I'm watching online, so video quality is not very good.

 

[IPostedWhat]

HOW IN THE HELL DID THEY DETERMINE THAT IT WAS A GOAL?

 

[dash]

Holy schneikies, it's a goal...

 

[IPostedWhat]

I would like to see the angle that they were looking at.

 

[sTyLnK]

Fans are gonna be ticked, but it's so obvious it was a goal.

 

[dash]

I don't what to say other than that's a terrible way to end a great game...

 

[naslundfan19]

HOW IN THE HELL DID THEY DETERMINE THAT IT WAS A GOAL?

I have no clue, IPW.

 

[naslundfan19]

Congrats, dash.

 

[IPostedWhat]

In all the views they were showing on TV, not one of them showed where the puck was, or if it even crossed the line.

That's some BS right there if you ask me.

 

[sTyLnK]

Well it was quite obvious the puck wasn't in the upper part of his chest. It was clearly caught up in the lower part of his body and that was in the net. Good goal. Don't give me that you couldn't see the puck crap. Good to see them make a call like this. They need more of them.

 

[dash]

Congrats, dash.

Good game nazzy (Canucks and Flames games usually are, even when the Canucks blow out the Flames)

 

[IPostedWhat]

Well it was quite obvious the puck wasn't in the upper part of his chest. It was clearly caught up in the lower part of his body and that was in the net. Good goal. Don't give me that you couldn't see the puck crap. Good to see them make a call like this. They need more of them.

So you're telling me that you could clearly see the puck and it was past the goal line?

 

[IPostedWhat]

I would just like to know what angle they were looking at that showed them that the puck crossed the goal line.

It was waved off as a goal on the ice and I thought they needed conclusive evidence to overturn that ruling?

 

[sTyLnK]

So you're telling me that you could clearly see the puck and it was past the goal line?

I'm sick of the whole you can't see the puck so it's no goal debate. In this case the puck was clearly caught up in the lower part of his body and that was in the net. It's a good goal.

 

[dash]

It was waved off as a goal on the ice and I thought they needed conclusive evidence to overturn that ruling?

Yeah, I thought so too (nothing conclusive in the replays I saw). Since most of Bobby Lou was in the net and the puck was with him, I guess that was enough.