- Thread starter
- #1
Cave_Johnson
R.I.P. Bob Saget
QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR
QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
Yeah thats a joke. Scott van pelt claims he invented it. Thats your problem right there.QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR
QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
So you're a fan of QBR over all else? It's "a" way but tough to agree it's the best.QB rating is the best way to determine who is an elite QB.
ESPN just assumed that RG3, Vick, Kaepernick, and Cam would all be nonstop Superbowl winners. They needed a stat to make sure those faces could sell ad space.
QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR
QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
Has ESPN's QBR even been around long enough for all those players to have won a Super Bowl?
You are right a total joke. I go by regular passer rating
It is not meant to say who had the better game, but rather who was more efficient per throw. If you triple the throws for QB1 you get 42-54 3 TDs. But with no Ints you would think Brady's rating would be a little higher too. Maybe it's just the bias against Brady that I keep reading about on here...QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR
QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
Lol....miss thisQB rating is the best way to determine who is an elite QB.