• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

ESPN, please stop pushing Total QBR. It's a joke.

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
QB rating is the best way to determine who is an elite QB.
 

Rock Strongo

My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
55,878
6,772
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
495 belt
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR

QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
Yeah thats a joke. Scott van pelt claims he invented it. Thats your problem right there.
 

CarlSr

Well-Known Member
1,797
82
48
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It's okay, but they push it as if it's 10X better than the standard QB rating. Perhaps if the league was full of running QBs, it would be. Yet despite knuckleheads proclaiming that reality was on the horizon for at least a quarter of a century (supposedly Randall Cunningham was the prototype), the best QBs in the league get it done with their arms far more than with their legs.
 

Beaker

Dragon's Bane
4,314
1,861
173
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I would not call it a joke. It is just one more number to use in a game you didn't watch.

Nothing beats the eye test, however
 

JMR

Go Army!
6,843
1,929
173
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

Hornsstampede2.0

Guy Who Never Responds
13,363
3,595
293
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Ellicott City, MD
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It is okay. But, if it went away...nobody would even notice it.
It really has shown no reason to supplant the standard rating system. Nobody complained about it.

It just seems like a make-believe stat that ESPN can force down our throats to cross promote its monopoly.
Essentially ESPN wants to fluff up and market flashy running QBs for highlight reels (and better sportscenter ratings).

ESPN just assumed that RG3, Vick, Kaepernick, and Cam would all be nonstop Superbowl winners.
They needed a stat to make sure those faces could sell ad space.
 

Breed

Well-Known Member
16,207
7,140
533
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Location
The Boondocks
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
ESPN just assumed that RG3, Vick, Kaepernick, and Cam would all be nonstop Superbowl winners. They needed a stat to make sure those faces could sell ad space.

Has ESPN's QBR even been around long enough for all those players to have won a Super Bowl?
 

NinerSickness

Well-Known Member
61,362
11,401
1,033
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR

QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR

QBR is 100% bull shit, and the fact that any human being who doesn't work for BSPN actually cites it is an indictment on the human race. It's literally not even a statistic.
 

Davis_Mike

You can never have too many knives.
17,495
4,222
293
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Location
Chandler, Arizona
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I didn't even see QBR listed under ESPN passing leader stats when I looked this morning.

Has ESPN's QBR even been around long enough for all those players to have won a Super Bowl?

I think QBR has been around for 3 seasons.

Edit: I see they have a seperate link for QBR stats.
 

Delphic1

Active Member
657
130
43
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we somehow get the math that is behind it then it will make sense. Until then it is a joke.
 

MIKE75

Member
527
80
28
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Location
Tennessee
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yep QBR is an ESPN stat thats useles.

Who did i have this disagreement with here a while back about QBR?

Someone here goes by QBR and they were trying to tell me Mettenberger or some QB sucked because of QBR which by the way is a useless stat.
 

Cave_Johnson

R.I.P. Bob Saget
9,535
3,833
293
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You are right a total joke. I go by regular passer rating

Regular passer rating has its flaws, but it seems to do a much better job at.....well.....accurately rating a QB's performance.
 

jarntt

Well-Known Member
34,562
12,984
1,033
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
QB 1: 14-18 153 yards 1 TD. 21 rush yards 1 TD. 98.5 Total QBR

QB 2: 38-59 466 yards 3 TDs. 70.8 Total QBR
It is not meant to say who had the better game, but rather who was more efficient per throw. If you triple the throws for QB1 you get 42-54 3 TDs. But with no Ints you would think Brady's rating would be a little higher too. Maybe it's just the bias against Brady that I keep reading about on here...
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,786
903
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

I am not a Cousins fan, but they say he had the lowest total QBR for his career last year, but had eight fourth-quarter comebacks. Either his team got the comebacks and he didn’t do much, comebacks have pretty loose parameters, that’s a bad stat that doesn’t really measure anything, or he has such terrible games otherwise (or really bad first 3 quarters). It seems that if you had eight comebacks, and the QBR is supposed to be rated on clutch play, that should be higher for him.
 

Dude

Well-Known Member
16,272
5,152
533
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,999.86
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Tic toc used to be just that like a clock. Today it is a widely used social media platform. Ok.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
16,786
903
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think @Dude just gave me a

fake interest cool story bro GIF


or was it a

On The Road GIF
?

Or was it an “if Aunt Bessie had balls she’d be my uncle”?
 
Top