obxyankeefan
Well-Known Member
I'm amazed I won 4 games.
3rd least points against and one of the two with less than you is only because of Milk's illegal lineup
I'm amazed I won 4 games.
I've always wanted an overall zero score for teams starting players on a bye, so for me they're equally bad.well... that sucked... i did realize i was illegal lineup midway through the sunday games... But made the assumption that since my active lineup was not illegal, i would still get points...
did not realize all illegal lineups get a zero... i personally hate that rule... but rules be rules...
just wondering what the purists here think is worse-
an illegal lineup because your bench either has too many or too little players- but all starting slots are taken by a starting player... or a LEGAL lineup where you are starting someone with a bye
well... that sucked... i did realize i was illegal lineup midway through the sunday games... But made the assumption that since my active lineup was not illegal, i would still get points...
did not realize all illegal lineups get a zero... i personally hate that rule... but rules be rules...
just wondering what the purists here think is worse-
an illegal lineup because your bench either has too many or too little players- but all starting slots are taken by a starting player... or a LEGAL lineup where you are starting someone with a bye
Bro, the last time I tried for him, you gave me a pretty unreasonable demand. At the time, anyway.
Oh, how things change.
I'm confused... how was your lineup illegal?
I don't think so..given the state of the RB market and Mixon's status going into '24 as a 29 year RB on a one year deal..there might only be one more year left out of Mixon, he could very well end up like Fournette in '25, and he hasn't exactly set the world on fire lately, might even be sooner than that.Are you saying getting Mixon for Pitts is is a bad deal, or your offer was better than Mixon?
Am I the only one who thinks SP got robbed?
That sneaky bandit.
I don't think so..given the state of the RB market and Mixon's status going into '24 as a 29 year RB on a one year deal..there might only be one more year left out of Mixon, he could very well end up like Fournette in '25, and he hasn't exactly set the world on fire lately, might even be sooner than that.
There's still hope for Pitts, and honestly at least half of his disappointment can be chalked up to horrid QB play and horrid offensive game planning- and the other half to him not learning how to frigging block so that he can stay on the field more than %75 of the time.
Too small of a bench. My lineup was fine though.
With browning at QB... doubtfulHope is fun, but that's what it is.
Mixon ROS could be worth a career of Pitts.
Well, that is the weirdest rule I've ever heard of... is that a Fantrax thing where we can't differentiate between separate "illegalities"?
Overall active roster size was too small.hey guys was the illegal line up too small of a bench
not fighting rules here
but is missing a bench player really illegal or was it actually something else ..
anyone know
Ya it looks like you can be short 1 or 2 but not 3 or more at least that is how i see it (is that correct)
i sometimes go short a player in leagues waiting for certain drops or injurie reports...
but in those leagues anyone added must be rostered for at least 2 days
so here where we can drop after a mistaken add well ...