SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
Ha good cause it's a square deal, one is Bette this year and possibly next one better long term imho and I would of thought about it!
That's how I saw the deal also. Decided I couldn't afford the short term hit.Ha good cause it's a square deal, one is Bette this year and possibly next one better long term imho and I would of thought about it!
I'd be all over that. .so long as I was receiving Marty B. Wouldn't take it if I were receiving Emmanuel thoughJust to let others in on the offer.
Emmanuel Sanders for Martavis Bryant
Wondering what others think about this.
I thought you would feel that way about it. I guessing most here will disagree.I'd be all over that. .so long as I was receiving Marty B. Wouldn't take it if I were receiving Emmanuel though
In with trff, but see both waysI thought you would feel that way about it. I guessing most here will disagree.
You posted right as I was putting the offer back up.In with trff, but see both ways
For me it comes down to if I want to count on some of my other WRs. In the short run, you come out ahead.Oh now u like it?
This one is more how I like Bryant's long term future than it is anything Bronco related. .but yea add that into the mix, that's an easy call for anyone not starstruck by any starting WR in Peyton Manning offense.I thought you would feel that way about it. I guessing most here will disagree.
This one is more how I like Bryant's long term future than it is anything Bronco related. .but yea add that into the mix, that's an easy call for anyone not starstruck by any starting WR in Peyton Manning offense
The competition for targets on the Steelers is fierce. You know AB is going to get the lions share.This one is more how I like Bryant's long term future than it is anything Bronco related. .but yea add that into the mix, that's an easy call for anyone not starstruck by any starting WR in Peyton Manning offense.
Honestly though. .who was Sanders with Big Ben? How good, granted it was in flashes, was Bryant with Ben? Who will Sanders be without Peyton?
Did well, yes. .but he was the typical fringe roster worthy wr in Pitt..and that was with a quality QB, what's he gonna do with Osweiler..or some other rookie ? And as the #2 in a Kubiak offense? Ask anyone who lined up opposite of Andre how well that worked outSanders has done well on both teams he's been on. So it's more then just being a Peyton target. JT is gone, so more passes to WRs also worth thinking about.
Did well, yes. .but he was the typical fringe roster worthy wr in Pitt..and that was with a quality QB, what's he gonna do with Osweiler..or some other rookie ? And as the #2 in a Kubiak offense? Ask anyone who lined up opposite of Andre how well that worked out
And DT won't in Denver?? And how many targets will there be to fight over once Manning is gone?The competition for targets on the Steelers is fierce. You know AB is going to get the lions share.
Lol..yeah sorry. .kinda forgot your trying to talk trade hereCome on man....your killing this. Let's see what SP says.