Does Paul Johnson teach guys to play dirty?

[FSUmanager]

Not talking about cut blocks. Check this out. Saw it during the game. Man this is some cheap shit to do. And if you're wondering. Yes same leg as his hamstring.

 

[Ojb81]

Are you serious with this?

Next thread, please.

 

[FSUmanager]

Wish Izzo #81 would've taken one for the team and beat this dude. No reason to even touch him. He was down.

 

[FSUmanager]

Are you serious with this?

Next thread, please.

There's this and the two intentional horse collars. Not saying this cost the game because it didn't. Many other things caused that. This is just cheap to do once a guy is down.

 

[Ojb81]

Do you think that little tug is really gonna affect someone's hamstring??

 

[Bamabino]

Les Miles teaches his to pull peoples' pants down.

 

[Agent Orange]

This isn't the first or second time I heard an accusation that Tech guys play dirty... so probably.

 

[Jakology]

That was fucked up and he should've been penalized for sure.

 

[B_dub]

A FSU fan complaining about another program being dirty. ...

 

[FSUmanager]

A FSU fan complaining about another program being dirty. ...
View attachment 44507

Mickey Andrews days are over. And I blasted guys for this kind of shit. No need for it.

 

[theboardref]

I would love to know why targeting is only called on a quarterback or wide receiver. Western Kentucky had a player tossed out later on a questionable call, but I would love to know why this did not warrant an ejection.

 

[FSUmanager]

I would love to know why targeting is only called on a quarterback or wide receiver. Western Kentucky had a player tossed out later on a questionable call, but I would love to know why this did not warrant an ejection.

From the camera views he led with his shoulder and didn't engage above the shoulders. Only thing I could say.

 

[Jakology]

But no, I don't think Paul Johnson teaches people to play dirty. That sounds like a bit of an overreaction.

 

[trojanfan12]

Not talking about cut blocks. Check this out. Saw it during the game. Man this is some cheap shit to do. And if you're wondering. Yes same leg as his hamstring.

Seriously?!?

I think OP has caught the ghey.

 

[4down20]

I would love to know why targeting is only called on a quarterback or wide receiver. Western Kentucky had a player tossed out later on a questionable call, but I would love to know why this did not warrant an ejection.

Players who are running with the ball aren't a defenseless player. The only exception is a QB who slides after a run(or any player I guess).

 

[theboardref]

Players who are running with the ball aren't a defenseless player. The only exception is a QB who slides after a run(or any player I guess).

When the man is stepping out of bounds and slowing down doesn't he become defenseless since he is not expecting the hit? Once again I really think the targeting ejection rule is stupid. It is a very subjective call.

 

[4down20]

When the man is stepping out of bounds and slowing down doesn't he become defenseless since he is not expecting the hit? Once again I really think the targeting ejection rule is stupid. It is a very subjective call.

If it's a late hit then that's a separate call. Just saying runners aren't defenseless because they can lower their heads and lay the hit as well.

So in the video you show, it would have been wrong to call targeting.

 

[theboardref]

If it's a late hit then that's a separate call. Just saying runners aren't defenseless because they can lower their heads and lay the hit as well.

So in the video you show, it would have been wrong to call targeting.

Thanks for clearing that up, but don't you think it is a bit stupid to say cheap shot A is ok to eject a player but cheap shot B isn't? I'm not arguing your assessment , I am arguing against the line of logic. Either it is all ejectable or none of it. I think it is stupid to eject for it.

 

[4down20]

Thanks for clearing that up, but don't you think it is a bit stupid to say cheap shot A is ok to eject a player but cheap shot B isn't? I'm not arguing your assessment , I am arguing against the line of logic. Either it is all ejectable or none of it. I think it is stupid to eject for it.

I'm not a fan of the ejections in general.

 

[romeo212000]

I'm not a fan of the ejections in general.

Nor I. The 15 yard penalty I get. But "targeting" is left way too vague and is much too open to interpretation. Why not have a helmet to helmet penalty, and a target penalty. Just because you have a helmet to helmet hit doesn't mean there was targeting. Targeting involves launching yourself like a missile into the head/neck area. But, officials are ejecting players for simply hitting high, or even worse when the ball carrier lowers his head.