defending the read option part 2

[skinsdad62]

Redskins use officiating visit to get option-play clarifications

this was an issue in part one but according to the officials if Rg3 , after giving the ball up to the RB shows he doesnt have the ball HE CANT BE HIT

so just hitting the qb will draw a flag as shark has stated on numerous occasions

 

[PDay8810]

"If a quarterback continues to carry out a fake in an attempt to make defenders believe he still has the ball, Steratore said, that quarterback is subject to being hit legally"

interesting and pretty much what I was saying 5 weeks ago. It's kinda an advantage defense when the fake isn't carried out fully and that remains the trade (legal) the defense will take.

Good read....Thanks Dad

 

[skinsdad62]

"If a quarterback continues to carry out a fake in an attempt to make defenders believe he still has the ball, Steratore said, that quarterback is subject to being hit legally"

interesting and pretty much what I was saying 5 weeks ago. It's kinda an advantage defense when the fake isn't carried out fully and that remains the trade (legal) the defense will take.

Good read....Thanks Dad

it settled the issue for that debate

 

[skinsdad62]

oh by the way Pday , if you guys hurt RG3 beware because RG1 (rex ) is burning up the read option in practice

 

[PDay8810]

oh by the way Pday , if you guys hurt RG3 beware because RG1 (rex ) is burning up the read option in practice

Dallas won't hurt RG3.....most likely won't lay a hand on him, and Dallas has lost to many #2 QB's in their time

 

[SaintGibbs]

RGIII got pretty good at throwing his hands up after the hand-off last season. He did it A LOT. He made a point of mentioning it in several pressers, so any debate about it was puzzling to me to begin with, but I know how some of you boys just like to 'debate':argue: