- Thread starter
- #1
vancelot23
Active Member
There's been some buzz that he may fall into the 20s. If Cincy drafts CB at 17, and DeCastro is still there at 21, and we don't take him, I'm driving to NY and pistol-whipping Marvin and Mike.
Only the Bengals could trade back for a worse player at the same position that was available with their original pick.
Only the Bengals...
That 3rd is essentially a 4th. And based on our drafting history, the pick will amount to nothing.
Everything I've read and heard had DeCastro rated higher. The Steelers having the option for both also had DeCastro rated higher. That's not to say Zeitler won't be a better player in the long run, but considering our drafting history, it was a foolish move to pass on a higher rated player.
DeCastro > Zeitler + the 90th or so pick.[/QUOTE]
Not to the Bengals, and that's all that matters really. Paul Alexander is inlove with Zeitler, and Lapham (forever the bengal homer) was all over this kid and said he wanted him over DeCastro and Glenn if the Bengals were to go guard in the 1st round.
I'll take it. It's not like Zeitler was some small time school big fish in a small pond player. The guy comes from a run heavy, heavily regarded program. He's started 36 of 40 games, and graded out in the 97% for his career (if I read that correctly from another article on ESPN). 0 sacks allowed. Big time oppoents. Smart. Durable. Can play center as well as guard.
I'm not going to complain.