- Thread starter
- #8,481
Dang you, @TKOSpikes! Beat me again!
Is that All-Time? If so, it is missing the 'ship column...
Was wondering if we can discuss a constitution change?
Here are my official proposals:
1) add a 3rd IR spot.
2) adjust the IR spot to include players deemed "OUT".
Arguments:
NFL rules have changed regarding IR players. (Could be as little as 4 weeks, 6 weeks or more.) I think we need to adapt since it is difficult to keep future "prospects" on your bench as player injuries become more common.
Plus, while we are scraping the dregs of the player pool, it would be nice to plug a long-shot in when injured players get labeled with the "out" designation - even for a week.
1) add a 3rd IR spot. --- YES
2) adjust the IR spot to include players deemed "OUT". --- NO
My players missed a total of 36 games this season.
They can't put guys out for one week on IR either though, so they also are forced to make difficult game day roster decisions in those instances.. sometimes even waiving/cutting a player they'd otherwise hope not toIf the perspective is for fantasy to emulate real football (especially dynasty), I can't imagine an NFL team only playing 10 guys on offense because of injury.
i did say ok if they really want it but i voted no as well the wire surely wont add to availability with more IR au contraire....Given the results of the survey this far in in the minority, by far, but yeah..
At some point, things that make roster decisions easier, or that 'would be nice' chip away at the foundation of the league.
3rd spot, sure whatever, I voted no, but meh, whatever.
Player being out being IR eligible? Absolutely no
true Joe except we play 10 through the whole game not 11 o with players in an out and 11 d with players in and out and special teams as wellIf the perspective is for fantasy to emulate real football (especially dynasty), I can't imagine an NFL team only playing 10 guys on offense because of injury.