- Thread starter
- #1
HurricaneDij39
The Middle of Everywhere: NWI
In February of 1980, the Lakers traded Don Ford and their 1st rounder for that following offseason for Butch Lee and the Cavs 1982 first rounder.
Ted Stepien, the Cavs' owner at the time, is arguably the worst owner in sports history. The Lakers won titles in both 1980 and 1982, so they were scheduled to have the lowest pick in each round. The Cavs had the NBA's worst record in 1982, so they would have been guaranteed one of the top two picks barring the result of the coin flip.
1982 would mark the only time in NBA history that the title winner picked first in the draft. The Lakers used their pick on James Worthy. The Cavs would use their pick they acquired in the trade on Chad Kinch, who played in all of 29 games in his career for Cleveland.
As for the performance of the players the Cavs had acquired in the deal - Don Ford averaged just over 3 PPG in parts of three seasons with the Cavs. Kinch averaged 2.8 PPG in those said 29 games.
This was the absolute dumbest trade in NBA history, and a significant part of my argument that Pat Riley had been more lucky than good in his NBA existence. There was no second place. At least Kobe was traded for a decent player in Vlade Divac.
Worthy had been brought along relatively slowly by the Lakers with the presence of Magic and Kareem. He broke his leg as a rookie with five games left in the regular season, and didn't break into the starting lineup on a full-time basis until his third year with the Lakers.
So, I pose the question - Would James Worthy's career had been as successful had he been with the Cavs? Cleveland had the likes of Mike Mitchell, Scott Wedman, and James Edwards he could have learned behind.
It's not that Stepien didn't have talent on his roster; It's that he chose to do stupid things with it. Stern had done everything in his power to kick Stepien out of the league, and Stepien would only last just over a year longer in the NBA after Worthy was drafted.
Thoughts?
Ted Stepien, the Cavs' owner at the time, is arguably the worst owner in sports history. The Lakers won titles in both 1980 and 1982, so they were scheduled to have the lowest pick in each round. The Cavs had the NBA's worst record in 1982, so they would have been guaranteed one of the top two picks barring the result of the coin flip.
1982 would mark the only time in NBA history that the title winner picked first in the draft. The Lakers used their pick on James Worthy. The Cavs would use their pick they acquired in the trade on Chad Kinch, who played in all of 29 games in his career for Cleveland.
As for the performance of the players the Cavs had acquired in the deal - Don Ford averaged just over 3 PPG in parts of three seasons with the Cavs. Kinch averaged 2.8 PPG in those said 29 games.
This was the absolute dumbest trade in NBA history, and a significant part of my argument that Pat Riley had been more lucky than good in his NBA existence. There was no second place. At least Kobe was traded for a decent player in Vlade Divac.
Worthy had been brought along relatively slowly by the Lakers with the presence of Magic and Kareem. He broke his leg as a rookie with five games left in the regular season, and didn't break into the starting lineup on a full-time basis until his third year with the Lakers.
So, I pose the question - Would James Worthy's career had been as successful had he been with the Cavs? Cleveland had the likes of Mike Mitchell, Scott Wedman, and James Edwards he could have learned behind.
It's not that Stepien didn't have talent on his roster; It's that he chose to do stupid things with it. Stern had done everything in his power to kick Stepien out of the league, and Stepien would only last just over a year longer in the NBA after Worthy was drafted.
Thoughts?