Yo Tee
Well-Known Member
I legitimately don't care about schedules for the most part unless it has Patriots or Steelers on there. And even then I don't care much. The entire division is probably losing to the Pats and so are the Steelers, am I really rustled if the Chiefs lose to the Pats? I'd say no.
Gonna make these blurby since I need to get out the door.
Rundown of the AFC:
AFCEast:
Pats
If you think any of the other 3 are better, you may need a drug test
AFC South:
Only better roster you could start arguing with is the Titans
Watson has given nobody a reason to think he's an upgrade over savage at this point in time. Adjust accordingly until proven otherwise.
AFC West:
Raiders have an argument- I think it's pretty weak and exaggerated, but I digress and will make this blurby as I need to get out the door
Broncos are starting Siemian- pretty hard to take them seriously as a contender in the AFC right now; just an annoying spoiler team
Chargers; they're the Chargers, always curve down given their total inability to find a roster that can stay healthy; bonus points for 1st year head coach. An argument exists, but it becomes hard to justify when underachievement is the norm from these guys.
AFC North:
Steelers; pretty good argument, they at minimum have the Chiefs number
Ravens are a newp
Ditto with the Bengals and supernewp for the Browns
Pretty spot on analysis I'd say haha. I would argue that I think Denver's defense makes up for Siemian as the starter. I see the Broncos in the WC hunt also. But probably an 8-8, 9-7 team.